Skip to main content

Security report for vrky.ee

Virumaa Rannakalurite Ühing MTÜ · Non-profit · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

44/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Virumaa Rannakalurite Ühing MTÜ is a regional non-profit association established in 2007 in Estonia, serving fisheries sector stakeholders in Ida- and Lääne-Virumaa. The organization supports local fisheries businesses, non-profits, and municipalities through project coordination and information dissemination. The website reflects a focused regional presence with clear business objectives and a target audience within the local fisheries community. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Google Fonts, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks some security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility and technical maturity appropriate for a small non-profit organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vrky.ee

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small-sized non-profit entity focused on the fisheries sector in Estonia. Its business model revolves around membership support, project management, and regional cooperation. The website content and structure indicate a stable market position within its niche, with clear communication channels and organizational transparency. The absence of commercial advertising and tracking tools aligns with its non-profit nature. Partnerships include regional government and fisheries-related entities, as evidenced by linked domains such as pria.ee. Growth indicators include ongoing project updates and active news postings. The organization maintains a consistent branding and professional online presence, supporting trust and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No forms on the homepage collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, which could be improved to demonstrate readiness for security events. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to align with GDPR best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Virumaa Rannakalurite Ühing MTÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Virumaa Rannakalurite Ühing MTÜ
Description
Virumaa Rannakalurite Ühing on asutatud 12. märtsil 2007. aastal Eismal, Lääne-Virumaal. Ühingu liikmeskonda kuuluvad Ida- ja Lääne-Virumaal tegutsevad, sh paiknevad kalandusvaldkonna ettevõtjad, mittetulundusühingud ja kohalikud omavalitsused.
Key services
Supporting fisheries businesses, Project coordination and cooperation, Providing information and resources to members
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, jQuery UI, Swiper.js, Meow Lightbox
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Right click protection on images
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a regional non-profit association in Estonia
  2. Content is in Estonian with some English Open Graph locale tags
  3. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage
  4. Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address present in footer
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML
  8. Use of modern JS libraries and fonts from Google Fonts
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing common front-end libraries such as jQuery 3.6.0, jQuery UI, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Google Fonts are used for typography, enhancing visual appeal. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility features are basic, with skip links present but no advanced ARIA roles detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small non-profit website with room for modernization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vrky.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vrky.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.