Skip to main content

Security report for vmf.lv

VMF LATVIA · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VMF LATVIA is a medium-sized company specializing in timber measurement, sampling of solid biofuel, and physical testing services primarily serving the Latvian and Baltic region transportation sector. The company emphasizes reliability, speed, and convenience, supported by an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified information security management system. Their website highlights strategic goals to enhance service availability and regional market expansion, alongside initiatives to digitize electronic document circulation in wood cargo transportation. Technically, the website employs a traditional tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Custom Search Engine, delivering a moderate performance with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the presence of ISO certification is a strong trust indicator; however, the absence of HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security posture and privacy compliance. The website is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers are displayed, and no social media presence is evident in the provided content. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy business front with solid security certification but could enhance transparency and technical security controls to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vmf.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vmf.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vmf.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VMF LATVIA holds a strong regional position in the timber measurement and transportation sector, leveraging ISO/IEC 27001 certification as a competitive advantage. Their business model focuses on providing specialized measurement and testing services to buyers and sellers in the timber and biofuel industries. The company is actively engaged in digital transformation initiatives, such as implementing electronic document circulation for wood cargo, indicating forward-looking growth strategies. The absence of detailed contact information and limited online marketing tools suggests a focus on B2B relationships and established client networks rather than broad consumer outreach. The company’s strategic goals emphasize service reliability, information protection, and regional market expansion, reflecting a mature and stable business operation within the transportation sector.

Security posture

The company demonstrates a moderate security maturity level, evidenced by ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, which indicates a formalized information security management system. However, the website lacks several modern security best practices such as HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS), anti-CSRF tokens in forms, and cookie consent mechanisms for GDPR compliance. The login form uses POST method but does not show advanced protections. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may limit transparency in security incident handling. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust verification. Overall, while foundational security controls appear in place, enhancements in web security configuration and privacy compliance are recommended to strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms, especially login forms, to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with GDPR requirements and improve user trust.
  4. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance transparency and customer support.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a WHOIS privacy service transparently to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VMF LATVIA
Description
VMF LATVIA provides timber measurement, sampling of solid biofuel, and physical testing services. The company focuses on reliable, fast, and convenient services with certified information security management according to ISO/IEC 27001:2022. They support digitization of electronic document circulation in wood cargo transportation and have strategic goals to increase service reliability and regional market presence.
Key services
Timber measurement, Sampling of solid biofuel, Physical testing, Electronic document circulation support for wood cargo transportation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Custom Search Engine
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by google.com scripts)
  • ISO/IEC 27001 certification
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with some English navigation options.
  3. ISO/IEC 27001 certification prominently displayed indicating focus on information security.
  4. No cookie consent or GDPR explicit compliance mechanisms visible.
  5. Login form present but no advanced security tokens detected.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly displayed on homepage.
  7. External scripts mostly from trusted sources (Google, jQuery CDN, Bootstrap CDN).
  8. No social media links found in the provided HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a conventional technology stack with jQuery 3.2.1 and Bootstrap 3.3.7 for UI components and responsiveness, alongside Google Custom Search Engine for site search functionality. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs, ensuring reliability. However, the Bootstrap version is outdated, which may pose security and compatibility risks. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features such as ARIA roles or semantic HTML5 elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved front-end performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vmf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vmf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.