Skip to main content

Security report for virsia.lv

Rīgas Būvserviss · Retail · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

74/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Būvserviss operates as a prominent Latvian retailer specializing in construction materials and tools, offering a broad product catalog and expert consultation services. The company targets construction professionals and retail customers across Latvia, emphasizing fast delivery and comprehensive product availability. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, it employs modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protections in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent but lacking a visible privacy policy or terms of service in the provided content. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching virsia.lv

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention virsia.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
128
Employees
0
Customers
127
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
5%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for virsia.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a key player in the Latvian construction retail sector, leveraging both online and physical store channels. Its extensive product categories and expert support suggest a customer-centric approach targeting both professionals and DIY consumers. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates active engagement in digital marketing and customer tracking. Absence of WHOIS data limits verification of domain legitimacy, but the website's content and metadata align with a legitimate commercial entity. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a focus on retail and manufacturing sectors.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens, indicating awareness of basic web security practices. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. The security score is moderate to good, but improvements in header implementation, vulnerability disclosure, and incident response readiness are recommended to enhance security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or security policy to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate commitment to security best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Būvserviss
Description
Buvserviss.lv - plašākais un iespējām bagātākais būvmateriālu veikals! Piedāvājam ātru piegādi, plašu produktu klāstu un zinošu ekspertu konsultāciju!
Key services
Building materials sales, Fast delivery across Latvia, Expert consultation, Wishlist and online shopping cart
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Cookiebot, JivoSite chat widget, Klaviyo analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in forms
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Klaviyo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian construction materials retailer with extensive product catalog.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  5. Contact phone number is clearly displayed; no company email found in provided HTML.
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and CSRF tokens for forms.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok Pixels, Cookiebot for consent management, and JivoSite for live chat support. The HTML structure is valid and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile-specific search forms. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. No CMS or hosting provider was explicitly identified. The site uses CSRF tokens for form security but lacks advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with virsia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review virsia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.