Skip to main content

Security report for vialietuva.lt

Lietuvos automobilių kelių direkcija VĮ · Transportation · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ViaLietuva.lt is the official website of Lietuvos automobilių kelių direkcija VĮ, a Lithuanian government agency responsible for managing the national road infrastructure. The site provides comprehensive information and services related to road permits, infrastructure projects, public procurement, and sustainability initiatives. It targets Lithuanian citizens, municipalities, contractors, and other stakeholders involved in road management and transportation. The website is well-positioned as the authoritative source for state road information and services in Lithuania. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, and accessibility plugins. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security and uses email obfuscation to protect contact information. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good SEO and metadata implementation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Email addresses are encoded to prevent scraping. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the presence of official registration numbers and consistent branding supports legitimacy. Overall, ViaLietuva.lt demonstrates a strong business and technical foundation with good security practices. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency would further enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vialietuva.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ViaLietuva.lt operates as a government entity managing Lithuania's state road infrastructure. Its market position is authoritative and essential for national transportation. The business model focuses on public service delivery, regulatory compliance, and infrastructure management. Revenue streams are likely government-funded. The target customers include public authorities, contractors, and road users. The site shows growth in digital services such as self-service portals and sustainability projects. Partnerships with related domains like eismoinfo.lt indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The company maintains a professional online presence with active social media channels, supporting communication and transparency.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA protects user input forms, reducing spam and abuse risks. Email obfuscation protects contact details from automated harvesting. Accessibility features indicate attention to inclusive design. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish an explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akcinė bendrovė „Via Lietuva“
VAT number
LT100009270611
Registration number
188710638
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lietuvos automobilių kelių direkcija VĮ
Description
Lietuvos automobilių kelių direkcija
Key services
Road permits, Road infrastructure management, Public procurement, Sustainability initiatives, International cooperation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, Contact Form 7, Email Encoder Bundle, Readabler accessibility plugin, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Email address obfuscation via Email Encoder Bundle
  • Accessibility features via Readabler plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian and English
  2. Strong focus on road infrastructure and public services
  3. No visible security or privacy policy gaps except missing cookie consent banner
  4. Good use of accessibility tools and modern web technologies
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and several plugins for contact forms, email encoding, and accessibility. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility is well addressed via the Readabler plugin offering multiple user customization options. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam prevention. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vialietuva.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vialietuva.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.