Skip to main content

Security report for veoneer.com

Veoneer · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Veoneer is a globally recognized leader in automotive safety electronics, specializing in the design, manufacture, and sale of advanced restraint control systems and safety sensors. The company emphasizes its mission to protect everyone in every crash and demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainable mobility and innovation. Their market position is solid, with over one billion sensors and electronic control units delivered worldwide, serving automotive manufacturers and partners. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting industry stakeholders and potential employees. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. The site integrates third-party services like YouTube and Investis Digital's cookie manager, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced transparency and trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the website presents a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and legal documentation. The domain registration details align well with the company's identity, supporting the legitimacy of the online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veoneer.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Veoneer operates in the transportation sector, focusing on automotive safety electronics. Their business model is B2B, supplying advanced safety systems to vehicle manufacturers globally. The company leverages its technological expertise to maintain a competitive advantage, emphasizing innovation and sustainability. The website content and linked resources suggest a strong partnership ecosystem and active engagement with stakeholders through press releases and social media. Career opportunities indicate growth and investment in human capital. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication strategy, likely to manage inquiries efficiently. Strategically, Veoneer positions itself as a technology leader with a clear mission, which supports brand loyalty and market trust. The presence of a partner portal and open source domain indicates collaboration and transparency within its ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. The absence of security headers in the HTML is a minor gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed credentials or sensitive information were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and may affect stakeholder confidence in security incident handling. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which is a best practice for responsible vulnerability management. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing relevant policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Include terms of service to clarify legal usage and responsibilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veoneer
Description
Veoneer is a world leader in automotive electronics safety systems, designing, manufacturing, and selling automotive safety electronics including restraint control systems. They emphasize protecting everyone in every crash and focus on sustainable mobility.
Key services
Automotive safety electronics design and manufacturing, Restraint control systems, Test laboratory services, EMS (Electronics Manufacturing Services)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, YouTube Player API, Investis Digital Cookie Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Investis Digital Cookie Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  3. No explicit terms of service found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
  5. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, YouTube, and WeChat.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Website uses Drupal CMS with modern frontend libraries.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates external resources such as Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and YouTube APIs. The cookie consent is managed via Investis Digital's cookie manager, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site shows good mobile optimization and accessibility features, including skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to enhance security headers and optimize loading times further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veoneer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veoneer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.