a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63
Not counted
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention veluxfoundations.dk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for veluxfoundations.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization holds a recognized position within the Danish philanthropic sector, leveraging the Velux brand. The website's simple structure and limited content suggest a focus on informational access rather than direct service delivery. The absence of detailed business or contact information limits deeper insights into operational scale or partnerships. The use of Drupal CMS and SVG branding indicates a modern but straightforward digital presence.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and uses minimal tracking via Plausible Analytics, reflecting a moderate security posture. However, the lack of visible security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, explicit privacy compliance documentation, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to improve trust and resilience.
Recommendations
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and security incidents.
Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Introduce a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
Enhance website content with more detailed business and trust indicators to improve credibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Velux Foundations
Description
Velux Foundations is a non-profit organization associated with the Velux group, focusing on philanthropic activities. The website provides access to two foundations: Villum Fonden and Velux Fonden, indicating a focus on grant-making or foundation activities.
Key services
Grant funding, Philanthropic support
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Drupal 9, SVG graphics, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link with https)
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
Site uses Drupal 9 CMS and includes SVG logos for branding.
Minimal tracking via Plausible Analytics, indicating some privacy consideration.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
Content is primarily navigational with links to two foundation sub-sites.
No social media links or contact forms detected in the HTML content.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with veluxfoundations.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veluxfoundations.dk.