Skip to main content

Security report for veloskola.lv

Rīgas riteņbraukšanas skola · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Riteņbraukšanas skola is a specialized cycling school based in Latvia, focusing on mountain biking, road cycling, and BMX disciplines. The organization provides training programs, organizes competitions, and offers cycling apparel through an online store. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence with active content updates, event calendars, and social media integration, positioning the school as a key player in the local cycling education and sports community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.0.2 with modern plugins such as Oxygen Builder and Contact Form 7, supported by Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR considerations. Contact information is transparent and professional, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving its educational and sports community effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response documentation, and WHOIS transparency would further strengthen its security and trust profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching veloskola.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rīgas Riteņbraukšanas skola operates as a small-sized educational and sports institution within the transportation and sports sectors in Latvia. Its business model revolves around youth cycling training, competition participation, and retail of branded cycling apparel. The school targets young athletes, parents, and cycling enthusiasts, leveraging local and international cycling events to build reputation and market presence. The website content and social media activity indicate active engagement and growth potential. Partnerships with apparel providers like TRUE STORY SPORT suggest a collaborative ecosystem. The organization maintains a clear focus on cycling disciplines, positioning itself as a specialized niche player with a strong community orientation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in comprehensive security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation to mitigate risks and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security collaboration.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data availability or use a registrar that provides transparent domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas riteņbraukšanas skola
Description
Rīgas Riteņbraukšanas skola is a cycling school offering training and education in mountain biking (MTB), road cycling, and BMX disciplines. It organizes competitions, training, and provides cycling apparel.
Key services
Cycling training (MTB, road, BMX), Competition organization and participation, Cycling apparel sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.0.2, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Oxygen Builder, Contact Form 7, Simple Lightbox, TablePress, Automatic CSS
Frameworks
WordPress, Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based cycling school site with active content and event updates.
  2. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanisms.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using version 6.0.2, enhanced with Oxygen Builder for design flexibility and Contact Form 7 for user interaction. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking purposes. The site loads external resources such as Google Fonts and cookie consent scripts, indicating a standard modern web infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with veloskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review veloskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.