Skip to main content

Security report for vehicleconsulting.com

Vehicle Consulting Group · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vehicle Consulting Group operates a professional website focused on business car leasing, salary sacrifice schemes, and fleet solutions across the UK. The company appears established since 2000, with a consistent domain registration and a clear business focus on transportation services for businesses. The website uses WordPress with the Divi theme and integrates SEO and cookie consent tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced DNS security and explicit security policies on the site. Privacy compliance is partial due to absence of visible privacy and terms policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vehicleconsulting.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets UK businesses needing flexible vehicle leasing and fleet management solutions. Its business model is service-oriented, leveraging salary sacrifice schemes and fleet solutions to serve a niche market. The long domain age supports credibility and market presence. The website content and structured data reinforce the brand identity and service offerings. However, lack of visible contact details and legal policies may limit customer trust and compliance. The company likely operates as a small-sized enterprise within the transportation sector, with potential for growth through enhanced digital presence and compliance.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer lock, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries. Security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Vehicle Consulting Group
Registration number
04360826
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vehicle Consulting Group
Description
Flexible business car leasing, salary sacrifice schemes, and fleet solutions from Vehicle Consulting. Expert advice with UK-wide service.
Key services
Business car leasing, Salary sacrifice schemes, Fleet solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, CookieYes Consent, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Divi (WordPress theme framework)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin
  2. Cookie consent implemented via CookieYes
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. No incident response or security contact information found
  7. Website content is business oriented and professional
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible framework. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and cookie consent is handled by CookieYes scripts. External resources include Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting is likely through IONOS SE, consistent with the registrar information. No major technical issues or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vehicleconsulting.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vehicleconsulting.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.