Skip to main content

Security report for vegetariers.nl

www.vegetariers.nl · Non-profit · Netherlands

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.vegetariers.nl represents a well-established non-profit organization focused on vegetarianism in the Netherlands, with a history spanning approximately 130 years. It provides comprehensive guides, recipes, tips, and expert knowledge to support a vegetarian lifestyle. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The presence of structured data and SEO optimizations further enhance its digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, use of reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit privacy and terms of service pages are missing, which slightly impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating a trustworthy and credible entity.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vegetariers.nl

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
Average
83
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vegetariers.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for vegetariers.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a knowledge leader in vegetarianism with a long-standing history, targeting a general audience interested in vegetarian lifestyle and health. Its business model is non-profit and educational, focusing on content delivery and community engagement rather than commercial sales. The website leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to understand and engage its audience, indicating a data-driven approach. The absence of direct contact details and formal security policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and user trust. The site’s consistent branding and high-quality content support its market position as a reputable source in its niche.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate to high, with HTTPS and modern security practices like Google reCAPTCHA and cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in formal security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts is extensive but common for marketing and analytics purposes. To enhance security posture, the organization should publish clear security policies and incident response information and regularly audit third-party dependencies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate readiness and transparency.
  3. Implement a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance security headers explicitly and document them to strengthen defense-in-depth.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
www.vegetariers.nl
Description
Start je vega levensstijl met uitgebreide gidsen, recepten, tips en informatie van kennisexperts Vegetariërsbond voor gezond vegetarisch eten.
Key services
guides, recipes, tips, information on vegetarian lifestyle
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), WP Rocket, WPBakery Page Builder, FontAwesome, Poppins font
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and performance plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, VWO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads (AW-1006156353), Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
VWO, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on vegetarian lifestyle education and community.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place.
  5. Lack of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  6. No direct contact information or security incident contacts found.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or suspicious content.
  8. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on WordPress 6.8.1 with Gravity Forms for data collection and WP Rocket for performance optimization. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Fonts are served via RocketCDN, and images are optimized and preloaded for performance. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO practices including structured data and meta tags. Hosting appears to use CDN services for fast content delivery. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a fast and user-friendly experience. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and formalize privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vegetariers.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vegetariers.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.