Skip to main content

Security report for vaanok.com

VAAN, s. r. o. · Retail · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VAAN, s. r. o. is a Slovak company specializing in the production and sale of high-quality natural cosmetics and skincare products. Their product range includes hydrolats, oil serums, balms, and fragrances, emphasizing pure natural ingredients and sustainable practices. The company targets consumers seeking natural and effective skincare solutions, positioning itself as a niche brand within the Slovak retail market. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and WooCommerce, featuring modern e-commerce capabilities and customer testimonials to build trust. Technical infrastructure includes standard tracking and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Ecomail, alongside cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and basic security practices, though improvements are recommended in DNS security and security headers. Overall, the website presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence aligned with the company's business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vaanok.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a direct-to-consumer e-commerce model focusing on natural cosmetics, leveraging a well-structured website with clear product categories and customer engagement through testimonials and a magazine/blog section. The business is relatively new, founded in 2023, and targets a specialized market segment interested in natural and sustainable skincare. The presence of structured data and SEO optimizations indicates an intent to grow organic traffic. Marketing efforts include retargeting and email marketing via integrated tools. The company maintains transparent contact information and VAT registration, enhancing credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes basic security measures such as reCAPTCHA and cookie consent. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are publicly available, which is a gap in security transparency. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate risks from external dependencies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Add and configure advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VAAN, s. r. o.
VAT number
SK2021954649
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VAAN, s. r. o.
Description
VAAN, s.r.o. je slovenská spoločnosť zameraná na výrobu a predaj prírodnej kozmetiky a starostlivosti o pleť. Špecializujeme sa na vysokokvalitné prírodné produkty vrátane hydrolátov, olejových sér, balzamov a kozmetických prípravkov s dôrazom na čisté, prírodné zloženie bez kompromisov. Naša filozofia je založená na spojení tradičných receptúr s modernými vedeckými poznatkami, pričom kladieme dôraz na ekologický prístup a udržateľnosť. Ponúkame riešenia pre všetky typy pleti s ohľadom na individuálne potreby zákazníkov.
Key services
Production and sale of natural skincare products, Hydrolats, serums, balms, fragrances
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Ecomail tracking, CookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ecomail
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Ecomail tracking
Marketing tools
Ecomail
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed e-commerce platform for natural cosmetics
  2. Uses modern WordPress and WooCommerce technologies
  3. Includes customer testimonials and structured data for SEO and trust
  4. Implements cookie consent and basic privacy mechanisms
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  6. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  9. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts present, indicating moderate user tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, utilizing WPBakery Page Builder for layout management. It integrates common marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Ecomail. The site uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. Hosting appears to be provided by Gransy, s.r.o., a Slovak hosting provider. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. Technical debt is minimal, but security enhancements and formal privacy documentation are needed to improve overall maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vaanok.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vaanok.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.