Skip to main content

Security report for urk.dk

Ungdommens Røde Kors · Non-profit · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ungdommens Røde Kors is Denmark's largest humanitarian youth organization, operating as a non-profit social entity focused on supporting children and young people both domestically and internationally. The organization relies heavily on volunteers and donations to deliver a wide range of services including mentoring, camps, workshops, and social support activities. Their website reflects a strong market position with clear messaging, comprehensive content, and a consistent brand identity targeting youth, volunteers, donors, and partners. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager, and integrates a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookie Information. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices and a moderate performance profile. External integrations include analytics and marketing tools from Piwik Pro, Google, Facebook, and Youtube. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a detailed cookie consent banner, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security or incident response policy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-aligned cookie management and clear privacy policy documentation. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance suitable for a large non-profit organization. Strategic improvements could include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen security posture and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching urk.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ungdommens Røde Kors holds a dominant position in the Danish humanitarian youth sector, leveraging a volunteer-driven model supported by donations and partnerships. Their business model focuses on social impact through direct engagement with vulnerable youth populations. The organization maintains a broad partnership ecosystem including cookie consent providers and analytics platforms, indicating a mature digital presence. Growth indicators include active social media channels and frequent content updates. The website's clear navigation and comprehensive service descriptions support effective outreach and volunteer recruitment. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, emphasizing an independent non-profit structure.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and consent management adds to the security reliability. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to formalize security communication channels.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable versions are in use.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to potential security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ungdommens Røde Kors
Registration number
28250479
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ungdommens Røde Kors
Description
Ungdommens Røde Kors er Danmarks største humanitære ungdomsorganisation. En frivillig, social organisation, der laver indsatser for og med børn og unge i hele Danmark og ude i verden.
Key services
Volunteer activities, Youth mentoring, Holiday camps and weekend camps, Support for vulnerable children and youth, Workshops and educational programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookie Information consent management
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Facebook, Youtube
Tracking pixels
Piwik Pro
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie declaration.
  3. Clear and consistent branding and business information.
  4. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and standard web technologies.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  8. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  9. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a solid foundation for content management and security updates. The integration of Google Tag Manager and Piwik Pro analytics indicates a mature approach to data collection and marketing. The site uses responsive design techniques and accessibility features, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset delivery and caching. The cookie consent implementation is robust and user-friendly. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, suggesting good maintenance practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with urk.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review urk.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.