Skip to main content

Security report for uprchlici-vitejte.cz

Sdružení pro integraci a migraci · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uprchlíci vítejte is a Czech Republic based non-profit project dedicated to facilitating dignified housing for refugees by connecting them with local residents willing to share their homes. The project is part of a broader European and international network and operates under the auspices of Sdružení pro integraci a migraci, a well-established organization providing legal and social support to migrants. The website provides comprehensive information about the project, its concept, FAQs, team members, and contact details, supporting transparency and trust. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, with a Bootstrap-based responsive design. It uses HTTPS and standard web technologies, but lacks some advanced security headers and privacy compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies. The site includes forms for housing offers and refugee registrations, as well as a newsletter signup integrated with Mailchimp. From a security perspective, the site shows good basic practices with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and security headers represents compliance and security gaps. Contact information is clearly provided, including emails, phone, and physical address, enhancing credibility. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is safe and appropriate for general audiences. Overall, the website is a credible and well-maintained platform supporting a socially important cause, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uprchlici-vitejte.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project occupies a niche in the social integration and refugee support sector in the Czech Republic, leveraging a proven European model. Its business model is donation and grant-based, with a focus on community engagement and direct service provision. The target audience includes refugees legally residing in the Czech Republic, housing providers, volunteers, and donors. The project benefits from partnerships with established organizations and networks, enhancing its legitimacy and reach. Growth potential exists through geographic expansion beyond Prague and Central Bohemia. The project’s competitive advantage lies in its personalized mediation approach and integration focus, differentiating it from mass refugee housing solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic but sound security posture with HTTPS encryption and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of reputable WordPress plugins and absence of suspicious scripts reduce risk. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies limit its security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or security contacts are provided, which could hinder incident management. The site should implement additional security controls and transparency measures to align with best practices and GDPR requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear data retention policies to improve user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sdružení pro integraci a migraci
Registration number
26612933
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sdružení pro integraci a migraci
Description
Platform/project facilitating dignified housing for refugees in the Czech Republic by connecting them with local people willing to share housing, aiming to avoid exclusion in mass refugee facilities and support integration.
Key services
Matching refugees with housing providers, Support and mediation during housing process, Community building and integration support, Information and legal advice via parent organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Bootstrap (navbar classes), Google Fonts, Mailchimp newsletter form
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of contact forms with Contact Form 7 plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit project focused on refugee housing integration in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multiple sections including FAQ, team, contact, and donation.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses WordPress with common plugins and standard technologies.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone, and physical address.
  7. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (WordPress) with a modern responsive design using Bootstrap and jQuery. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site integrates external services such as Mailchimp for newsletters and Google-hosted scripts for emojis. Hosting is via Active24 with DNS managed by websupport.cz. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The technical stack is standard for non-profit organizations, offering ease of maintenance but requiring vigilance on plugin security and updates to avoid technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uprchlici-vitejte.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uprchlici-vitejte.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.