Skip to main content

Security report for vgt.com.mt

Valletta Gateway Terminals Ltd. · Transportation · Malta

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Valletta Gateway Terminals Ltd. is a Malta-based terminal operator specializing in multipurpose cargo handling services including RoRo, container, conventional cargo, and car transhipment. The company operates key port facilities such as the Deep Water Quay and Laboratory Wharf, serving shipping lines and logistics providers. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a clear market position in the Maltese transportation sector, supported by a parent company, Portek International Limited. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Slider Revolution and Yoast SEO, hosted likely on WP Engine. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. The site uses Google Analytics for user tracking and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, suggesting a stable security posture but with room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy regulations. Strategic enhancements in security headers, incident response transparency, and vulnerability disclosure would strengthen its security maturity and trustworthiness further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
23/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vgt.com.mt

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
23
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Valletta Gateway Terminals Ltd. holds a strategic position in Malta's port operations, leveraging its multipurpose terminal capabilities to serve a diverse clientele including shipping lines and import/export businesses. The company benefits from its association with Portek International Limited, enhancing its operational credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from cargo handling fees, berthing charges, and ancillary services such as security and administration. The website targets logistics professionals and businesses requiring port services, emphasizing service breadth and operational facilities. Partnerships with technology providers like Smart Technologies Ltd. indicate a focus on digital presence and operational efficiency. Growth indicators include updated content, active social media presence, and comprehensive service listings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The presence of cookie consent aligns with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No dedicated security policy or incident response information is published, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party plugins necessitates regular vulnerability assessments. Overall, the security posture is adequate for business operations but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing detailed privacy and data protection information aligned with GDPR.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Valletta Gateway Terminals Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Valletta Gateway Terminals Ltd.
Description
Valletta Gateway Terminals Ltd. operates multipurpose terminals providing cargo handling services including RoRo, containers, conventional cargo, car import/export/transhipment, and berthing security and admin services.
Key services
Handling of RoRo, Handling of Containers, Handling of Conventional Cargo, Car Import / Export / Transhipment, Security & Admin Fee (Berthing)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slider Revolution, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Google Analytics, Weather Atlas plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant and focused on terminal operations and services.
  3. Contact information is clear and includes multiple physical locations and phone numbers.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No critical security issues detected but security headers could be improved.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, and popular plugins such as Slider Revolution and Contact Form 7. Hosting appears to be managed by WP Engine, a reputable WordPress hosting provider. The site includes SEO optimizations via Yoast SEO and integrates Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline third-party dependencies to reduce technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vgt.com.mt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vgt.com.mt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.