Skip to main content

Security report for unionaviation.aero

Union Aviation · Transportation · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Union Aviation is a business aviation operator specializing in charter sales and aircraft management services, targeting brokers and aircraft owners primarily in Latvia and international markets such as London, Dubai, and Cyprus. The company positions itself as a premium provider focused on comfort and pleasure in private aviation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and multiple contact channels, including email, phone, and social media. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some security headers are missing. HTTPS is enabled, and contact forms are secured with required fields. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are published, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust assessment. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and transparency around incident response. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking explicit consent mechanisms. Business credibility is strong due to professional content, clear contact information, and social media presence. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security policies, WHOIS transparency, and improved privacy compliance to strengthen its risk posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unionaviation.aero

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention unionaviation.aero, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for unionaviation.aero right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Union Aviation operates in the transportation sector, specifically in business aviation. Its business model revolves around providing charter sales services to brokers and aircraft management services to aircraft owners. The company targets a niche market of high-net-worth individuals and corporate clients seeking premium private aviation solutions. The website indicates a small-sized company with a focused service portfolio and geographic presence in Latvia and key international cities. The company leverages digital marketing through social media and Google Tag Manager analytics. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its curated fleet and personalized service approach. Growth indicators include a professional online presence and active social media engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Union Aviation’s website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The contact forms are secured with required fields, reducing risk of injection attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies, but no explicit consent mechanism is observed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved with enhanced headers, incident response disclosures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security incidents to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by implementing explicit cookie consent mechanisms and clearly stating data retention policies.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring accurate and complete domain registration information to increase trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Union Aviation
Description
Business Aviation Operator. Charter Sales and Aircraft Management Services.
Key services
Charter Sales, Aircraft Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact forms with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a business aviation operator.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and includes email, phone, address, and contact form.
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram supports business credibility.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. Uses Webflow CMS and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  8. No detected WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS with responsive design principles, providing good mobile optimization and user experience. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The technical stack is modern but limited in complexity, suitable for a small business website. There is no evidence of server-side frameworks or advanced backend technologies. The absence of security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unionaviation.aero. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unionaviation.aero.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.