Skip to main content

Security report for unilever.cz

Unilever PLC · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Unilever Česká republika operates as a regional branch of the global consumer goods giant Unilever PLC, providing a wide range of well-known brands in food, home care, and personal care sectors. The website reflects a mature enterprise-level digital presence with a focus on user experience, accessibility, and compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. The site employs modern web technologies including the Astro framework and integrates cookie consent management via OneTrust, alongside Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for performance and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unilever.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention unilever.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for unilever.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as part of Unilever PLC, targeting general consumers in the Czech Republic with a portfolio of consumer goods brands. The business model centers on brand management and product distribution in retail sectors. The website supports corporate communications, career opportunities, and customer contact through structured navigation and official social media channels. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via web forms. The digital ecosystem includes global Unilever domains and localized notices for privacy and cookie policies, indicating a well-integrated compliance and marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and OneTrust is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could benefit from enhanced documentation and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UNILEVER ČR, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Unilever PLC
Description
Ve společnosti Unilever uspokojujeme každodenní potřeby značkami, které pomáhají lidem cítit se dobře, vypadat dobře a mít ze života více
Key services
Consumer brands in food, home care, personal care
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Astro framework, OneTrust cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with reject/accept options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. Social media presence is consistent with official Unilever accounts.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (Astro, ES modules).
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards and the Astro framework, leveraging ES modules and lazy hydration for performance optimization. It includes preloading of fonts and uses responsive images for efficient media delivery. The integration of OneTrust for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics reflects a mature approach to privacy and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with excellent accessibility features, including skip links and ARIA attributes. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting details are not disclosed, but service worker registration indicates progressive web app capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, accessible, and compliant user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unilever.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unilever.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.