Skip to main content

Security report for umdpl.info

Асоціація УМДПЛ · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website umdpl.info represents a Ukrainian human rights non-profit association named Асоціація УМДПЛ, also branded as “ФРІРАЙТС”. It focuses on digital rights, penitentiary oversight, legal education, criminal justice, and activist protection. The organization targets activists, government bodies, and the general Ukrainian public, providing educational resources, reports, and special projects. The domain is well-established since 2008, supporting the organization's credibility and longevity. Technically, the site runs on an outdated WordPress 4.4.2 CMS with older jQuery libraries, which introduces security risks. The site uses Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social media integration. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with moderate performance. No advanced SEO or modern frameworks are detected. Security posture is moderate but with notable gaps: HTTPS is enabled, but no DNSSEC, no security headers, and no cookie consent mechanisms are present. The outdated CMS and libraries increase vulnerability exposure. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the site is functional and credible for its non-profit mission but requires technical and security modernization. Strategic improvements in security headers, CMS updates, privacy compliance, and user experience would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching umdpl.info

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in the non-profit sector focused on human rights advocacy in Ukraine. It holds a stable market position as a recognized rights organization with a multi-year history. Its business model revolves around advocacy, education, and protection services rather than commercial revenue. The target audience includes civil society activists, local government officials, and the general public interested in rights protection. The organization maintains a network of related projects and special initiatives, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active news updates and educational events. Partnerships are primarily internal projects and social media channels, with no commercial subsidiaries.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate but with significant improvement needs. The presence of HTTPS is positive; however, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options weakens defense against common web attacks. The use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions exposes the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing cookie consent and privacy policies. Overall, the security culture appears basic, suitable for a small non-profit but requiring urgent upgrades to protect data and reputation.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins/themes to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Internet Invest, Ltd. dba Imena.ua
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Асоціація УМДПЛ
Description
Правозахисна асоціація “ФРІРАЙТС” з напрямками діяльності у цифрових правах, пенітенціарній сфері, просвітництві, кримінальній юстиції та захисті активістів. Має спецпроекти, інформаційні ресурси та просвітницькі заходи.
Key services
Цифрові права, Пенітенціарний контроль, Просвітництво з прав людини, Правосуддя в кримінальній юстиції, Захист активістів
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.4.2, jQuery 1.11.3, Google Analytics, Google APIs, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google APIs
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Ukrainian human rights non-profit association site.
  2. Content is primarily in Ukrainian with English alternate language available.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on main pages.
  4. Uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, posing security risks.
  5. No visible security headers or cookie consent mechanisms.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube is integrated.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.4.2, which is significantly outdated and unsupported, posing security and compatibility risks. The front-end uses jQuery 1.11.3, also outdated. Google Fonts and Google APIs are used for fonts and authentication features. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are implemented for tracking. Facebook SDK is integrated for social media features. The site lacks modern performance optimizations and accessibility enhancements. Hosting is provided by Internet Invest, Ltd. dba Imena.ua, a Ukrainian registrar and hosting provider. The site is moderately performant but could benefit from updated technologies and improved mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with umdpl.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review umdpl.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.