Skip to main content

Security report for ukrbs.org

Українське Біблійне Товариство · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Ukrainian Bible Society (Українське Біблійне Товариство) operates as a non-profit organization dedicated to the publishing and distribution of biblical literature in Ukraine. Their offerings include modern translations of the Bible, editions in Ukrainian and Russian, children's religious literature, and charitable programs supporting the armed forces and crisis-affected families. The website is primarily targeted at Ukrainian-speaking audiences interested in religious texts and spiritual resources. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Gravity Forms and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Mautic. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ukrbs.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a significant position in the Ukrainian religious literature market, focusing on non-profit distribution and charitable activities. Their business model revolves around publishing and disseminating biblical texts and supporting related charitable causes. The website content reflects a focused mission with no commercial advertising or affiliate marketing. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, which is typical for non-profit entities. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates room for improvement in compliance and transparency. The organization appears to maintain a moderate level of digital maturity with standard web technologies and marketing tools.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The use of reputable third-party libraries and plugins reduces the risk of vulnerabilities, but the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were observed in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing additional security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response contact.
  4. Regularly audit third-party plugins and scripts for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct usability testing to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Українське Біблійне Товариство
Description
Non-profit organization focused on distributing biblical literature in Ukraine, including modern translations and various editions of the Bible in Ukrainian and Russian languages, as well as children's literature and parts of the Bible.
Key services
Publishing modern Bible translations, Distribution of Bibles in Ukrainian and Russian, Providing children's biblical literature, Charitable initiatives supporting armed forces and crisis families
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Mautic (marketing automation), Bootstrap (CSS framework)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mautic
Marketing tools
Mautic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not available publicly, indicating privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses multiple Google tracking and marketing scripts.
  6. Content is primarily in Ukrainian language and focused on religious and charitable activities.
  7. Site uses WordPress CMS with Gravity Forms plugin for forms.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with Gravity Forms for form handling, jQuery for JavaScript functionality, and Bootstrap for responsive design. Marketing and analytics are managed through Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Mautic. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident through meta tags and structured styles. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information was found. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security headers. The technical stack is standard for non-profit organizations and supports the site's mission effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ukrbs.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ukrbs.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.