Skip to main content

Security report for ukezuki.com

Retail · Japan

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ukezuki.com is a Japanese-language niche content site focused on cosmetic primer product recommendations and rankings. It targets Japanese-speaking consumers interested in makeup base products, providing reviews and affiliate marketing links. The site content is accessible and moderately structured but lacks comprehensive business and security information. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with a Shift_JIS charset, and includes a third-party tracking script from Research Artisan Pro. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or CMS usage. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies, which raises compliance concerns. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a significant trust concern, as it suggests the domain may not be properly registered or is using privacy protection that is not disclosed. Overall, the site scores moderately on content and technical aspects but poorly on security and privacy compliance, indicating a need for improvements in these areas to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ukezuki.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ukezuki.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ukezuki.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale content and affiliate marketing site within the retail sector, specifically cosmetics. Its market positioning is niche, focusing on makeup base product reviews for a Japanese audience. The business model relies on content-driven affiliate sales rather than direct product sales. External links suggest partnerships or affiliate relationships with various unrelated domains, likely for monetization. The absence of clear company information, contact emails, or phone numbers limits transparency and may impact user trust. Growth potential depends on improving compliance, security, and clearer business identity.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor GDPR or similar compliance. The site uses third-party tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. The lack of contact information for incident response or security issues further weakens the security posture. No vulnerabilities were detected in the provided HTML, but the absence of basic security controls is a risk. The domain registration status is unclear, which is a critical trust and security concern.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Deploy standard security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides recommendations and rankings for cosmetic primers (化粧下地), focusing on product reviews and user feedback. It targets consumers interested in makeup base products, especially those concerned with makeup longevity and skin appearance.
Key services
Cosmetic primer product reviews, Ranking and recommendation content, Affiliate links to purchase products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is limited to a contact form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Site uses a Japanese character set (Shift_JIS) and targets Japanese-speaking users.
  6. External links mostly point to unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or advertising related.
  7. Tracking script from Research Artisan Pro is present, indicating user analytics.
  8. No social media links or company contact emails detected.
  9. No security headers or advanced security measures detected in the HTML content.
  10. Site appears to be a small niche content site focused on cosmetic primer product recommendations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, using Shift_JIS charset for Japanese content. It includes JavaScript for tracking via Research Artisan Pro but lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph or Twitter Card metadata. The site structure is simple with clear navigation menus but limited interactive elements. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in adopting HTTPS, improving SEO, and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ukezuki.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ukezuki.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.