Skip to main content

Security report for ufrantiska.cz

U Františka, z.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

U Františka, z.s. is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to the care and rehabilitation of abandoned, stray, or abused dogs, including operating a dog hotel and providing canistherapy services. The organization is officially approved by regional veterinary authorities and the ministry, positioning it as a trusted local animal welfare entity. The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and common plugins, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ufrantiska.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on animal welfare and rehabilitation, targeting the general public and especially children interested in cynological activities. Its business model centers on providing shelter, rehabilitation, and therapeutic services for dogs, with additional community engagement through sports and educational activities. The domain age and registration data align with the organization's founding year, supporting legitimacy. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports community outreach. No commercial advertising or affiliate programs are detected, consistent with a non-profit model. The organization appears to have a focused niche market position with potential for growth in community engagement and service offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited formal security governance. The site uses well-known WordPress plugins and themes, which if kept updated, reduce risk. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing security headers, formal policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
U Františka, z.s.
Description
Zabýváme se péčí o opuštěné, toulavé, nebo týrané psy, provozujeme psí hotel. Dále přibližujeme kynologické aktivity, sporty a jiné činnosti spojené se psy široké veřejnosti a hlavně dětem. Poskytujeme také netradiční metody pomoci nemocným či jinak handicapovaným lidem (canisterapie, výcvik psů pro canisterapii).
Key services
care for abandoned, stray, or abused dogs, dog hotel services, promotion of cynological activities and sports, canistherapy and dog training for therapy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Yoast SEO plugin, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Easy Fancybox
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit animal shelter and rehabilitation center in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is confirmed.
  6. Website uses WordPress with Astra theme and common plugins.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Astra theme and uses plugins such as Yoast SEO and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and uses local font hosting for performance. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics but no blocking issues detected. SEO is enhanced by Yoast plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are limited to registrar information (REG-WEBGLOBE). There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ufrantiska.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ufrantiska.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.