Skip to main content

Security report for ucmeseprezit.cz

Tým silniční bezpečnosti · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Učme se přežít' is an educational platform focused on motorcycle safety and road safety awareness primarily in the Czech Republic. It offers various training courses, publications, and organizes events aimed at improving motorcycle handling skills and safety knowledge. The site is supported by partnerships with government agencies and safety organizations, enhancing its credibility within its niche market. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as the Svelte framework and ES modules, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with data protection regulations. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks visible security headers and formal incident response contacts. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the content and partnerships suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ucmeseprezit.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector with a focus on motorcycle safety education. Its market positioning is niche, targeting motorcycle riders, instructors, and safety professionals. The business model revolves around educational services, event organization, and distribution of safety publications. Partnerships with police, government, and safety organizations provide strategic advantages and trust signals. The company appears to be small in size with a localized focus in the Czech Republic. Growth potential exists through expanding course offerings and digital content. The lack of explicit business registration details and WHOIS transparency suggests an opportunity to improve corporate transparency and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no obvious exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics without visible privacy disclosures may pose privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is basic to moderate, suitable for an informational site but requiring improvements to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response contact.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and minimize tracking to enhance user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tým silniční bezpečnosti
Description
The website promotes motorcycle safety education and training courses, including specialized courses for teachers, commissioners, and scooter drivers. It offers publications and organizes events focused on road safety and motorcycle handling skills.
Key services
Motorcycle safety courses, Training for teachers and commissioners, Scooter driving courses, Publications and educational materials, Organized motorcycle rides and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Svelte framework, Google Analytics (gtag.js), NProgress (progress bar), CSS variables and modern CSS
Frameworks
Svelte
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on motorcycle safety education and public awareness.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain trust assessment.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (Svelte, ES modules).
  6. Presence of Google Analytics for user tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  7. Multiple reputable partners and government-related organizations linked.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  9. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Svelte framework with modern JavaScript modules, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and NProgress for progress indication. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses CSS variables for styling. Performance appears moderate with video backgrounds and multiple images. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. Technical debt is low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to reduce risks and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 41/100High36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ucmeseprezit.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ucmeseprezit.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.