Skip to main content

Security report for uavarta.org

Українська Жіноча Варта · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Українська Жіноча Варта is a Ukrainian non-profit organization dedicated to empowering civilians, especially women, through training in self-defense, medical aid, and survival skills during wartime. The organization also provides daily news updates about the war in Ukraine, positioning itself as a key community resource for civilian resistance and education. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and integrates multiple languages to reach a broad audience. It leverages modern web technologies and plugins to deliver event management, contact forms, and SEO optimization effectively. The hosting is provided by Hosting Ukraine LLC, with domain registration consistent with the organization's Ukrainian focus. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and Cloudflare DNS, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Tracking technologies such as Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager are used, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and serves its community purpose well, but could enhance privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of uavarta.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uavarta.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on civil defense and women's resistance in Ukraine. Its business model centers on education and information dissemination rather than commercial revenue. The website's multilingual support and active social media presence suggest a strategy to engage both local and international supporters. The use of WooCommerce hints at possible merchandise or donation sales, though no direct evidence was found in the provided content. The organization benefits from trust signals such as structured data, social media integration, and a stable domain registration. However, the lack of formal privacy and security policies may limit trust among privacy-conscious users. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators include active content updates and event management capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare DNS usage. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. The absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks such as clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations and potential attack surface. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are missing, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to improve user privacy and reduce attack surface.
  5. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan to improve organizational security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Українська Жіноча Варта
Description
Громадська Організація, що проводить навчання по самообороні, медицині, виживанню під час бойових дій для цивільних, а також щоденні новини про війну в Україні.
Key services
навчання по самообороні, навчання по медицині, навчання по виживанню під час бойових дій, щоденні новини про війну
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Modern Events Calendar Lite, Contact Form 7, ShareThis, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Use of Cloudflare nameservers (karina.ns.cloudflare.com, ram.ns.cloudflare.com)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Ukrainian non-profit organization focused on women's resistance and civilian training.
  2. Content is primarily in Ukrainian with multiple language alternates available.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for events, forms, and SEO.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Contact phone number is provided in structured data; contact forms are present.
  6. Uses HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. Includes tracking scripts from Facebook, Google, and ShareThis.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Website content is safe for general audiences with no adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using popular plugins such as Elementor for page building, WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, and Modern Events Calendar Lite for event management. It uses Contact Form 7 for user interaction forms and integrates social sharing via ShareThis. The site is hosted by Hosting Ukraine LLC with Cloudflare DNS nameservers, providing a reliable hosting environment. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uavarta.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uavarta.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.