Skip to main content

Security report for twmhr.org.uk

Mental Health Resource · Non-profit · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mental Health Resource was a UK-based non-profit charity focused on supporting mental and emotional wellbeing in West Kent since 1993. The organization provided a variety of free services including wellbeing groups, peer support, advocacy, youth projects, and crisis support. The website currently serves as an announcement of the charity's closure as of January 30, 2026. The site content is accessible and professionally presented but lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to a registration error indicating the domain is invalid under Nominet UK rules, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the accessible content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Tailwind CSS and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is a lack of security headers and no visible analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal data collection. The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS verification and security best practices. Privacy compliance is poor with no GDPR indicators or cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and safe informational resource about the charity's closure but suffers from significant domain legitimacy issues and lacks essential security and privacy features. Strategic improvements should focus on securing the domain registration, implementing HTTPS and security headers, and adding privacy and cookie policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching twmhr.org.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mental Health Resource operated as a small local non-profit charity with a strong community presence in West Kent for over 30 years. Its business model centered on providing free mental health support services funded by local government and community partners. The charity's market position was that of a trusted community mental health resource with a dedicated volunteer and staff base. The closure announcement indicates cessation of operations, which impacts ongoing service delivery. The website does not reveal revenue streams or detailed partnership ecosystems but acknowledges funders and community supporters. The digital presence is modest, focusing on informational content rather than active engagement or fundraising. Growth indicators are not applicable due to closure. The charity's operations were shaped by compassion and community involvement, with a legacy of supporting thousands of individuals.

Security posture

The website's security posture is limited. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL/TLS configuration from the provided data, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The WHOIS data is missing due to domain registration issues, which is a significant trust and legitimacy concern. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit security monitoring capabilities. Overall, the site is informational with minimal attack surface but requires improvements in domain legitimacy, HTTPS implementation, and privacy compliance to strengthen security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Secure and verify domain registration with Nominet UK to resolve naming rule violations and ensure legitimacy.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mental Health Resource
Description
Mental Health Resource was a charity dedicated to supporting mental and emotional wellbeing in West Kent since 1993. It provided free services including wellbeing groups, peer support, advocacy, youth projects, and crisis support. The charity closed on 30 January 2026.
Key services
Wellbeing groups, Peer support groups, Advocacy services, Youth projects, Out-of-hours crisis support, 1-1 support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Tailwind CSS, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly present.
  4. Website is a static informational page announcing closure of a mental health charity.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error from Nominet UK.
  6. Site uses WordPress CMS with Tailwind CSS and jQuery.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Website design is simple but professional and consistent with charity branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Tailwind CSS for styling and jQuery for scripting. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good content quality and consistent branding. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or analytics integration. Accessibility features are minimal but acceptable. The site lacks advanced security configurations and does not use modern security frameworks or analytics tools. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. The technical infrastructure supports a simple informational site but requires modernization and security enhancements to meet current best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with twmhr.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review twmhr.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.