Skip to main content

Security report for turkalnesmuiza.lv

SIA Turkalnes Muižas klēts · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Turkalnes Muiža is a historic Latvian estate operating a craft brewery and cider production business, offering local alcoholic beverages and event hosting services. The website serves as an e-commerce platform and informational portal for visitors and customers. The business targets local and regional consumers interested in traditional and craft alcoholic drinks and event experiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics for user insights. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating basic GDPR compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve privacy transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching turkalnesmuiza.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on craft alcoholic beverages and event hosting. Its business model combines direct sales via an online store and on-site experiences such as tastings and venue rentals. The company appears to be a small local business with a long historical background dating back to 1604. The website content and contact details support legitimacy and local market positioning. The use of social media and Google Analytics indicates engagement with digital marketing and customer analytics. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The business benefits from niche market appeal and cultural heritage but should enhance compliance documentation to build trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, reflecting basic security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WooCommerce platform and WordPress CMS require regular updates to prevent known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which could be a gap in organizational security readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web threats.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities, especially WooCommerce components.
  4. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Turkalnes Muižas klēts
Registration number
40203113388
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Turkalnes Muižas klēts
Description
Turkalnes Muiža is a historic estate established in 1604, with a cider and beer brewery producing local alcoholic beverages such as beer, cider, and wine. The business offers event hosting, tastings, and an online store for ordering their products.
Key services
Craft beer and cider production, Event hosting and tastings, Online sales and local delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Redux
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor for e-commerce and page building
  3. Includes cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR
  4. Contact information clearly displayed in footer
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure info
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  9. Website promotes alcoholic beverages with appropriate legal disclaimers
  10. No adult explicit content but alcohol content restricts audience to mature users
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress-based tech stack with WooCommerce for e-commerce and Elementor for page building. It loads Google Fonts and jQuery libraries and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile responsive and uses CSS and JavaScript optimizations. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses cookie consent plugins to comply with GDPR. There is some technical debt in missing security headers and lack of explicit privacy and security documentation. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but has room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with turkalnesmuiza.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review turkalnesmuiza.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.