Skip to main content

Security report for tuf.lv

SIA “TUF” · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA “TUF” operates a professional automotive repair and painting service business in Latvia, specializing in brands such as Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, VOLVO, and VW. Established since 1992, the company offers a comprehensive range of services including diagnostics, engine and suspension repairs, bodywork, and environmentally compliant painting solutions. The website is well-structured, multilingual, and targets vehicle owners seeking reliable auto maintenance and repair services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, enhanced with plugins for booking and multilingual support, and integrates marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. Overall, the business presents a trustworthy and professional image with a solid local market presence, though domain registration details are unavailable for full legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tuf.lv

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable position in the local automotive service market with over three decades of operation and a loyal customer base exceeding 1000 clients. Its business model focuses on providing high-quality repair and painting services, leveraging modern technologies and EU-compliant materials. The website supports customer engagement through appointment scheduling and multilingual content, enhancing accessibility. Partnerships with digital marketing agencies and use of tracking pixels suggest active marketing efforts. The absence of detailed WHOIS data limits full assessment of domain ownership but does not detract from the evident operational legitimacy and market focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, and no sensitive data exposure was detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate a moderate security maturity level. The use of popular WordPress plugins and themes requires ongoing vulnerability management to mitigate risks. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism, which may pose GDPR compliance challenges. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhancements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit WordPress plugins and themes to prevent exploitation of known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant industry certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “TUF”
Description
Specializes in professional auto repair and painting services since 1992, focusing on brands like Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, VOLVO, VW. Offers diagnostics, engine, gearbox, suspension repairs, bodywork, and painting using modern technologies and water-based paints compliant with EU standards.
Key services
Auto repair and diagnostics, Auto painting and bodywork, Spare parts supply, Appointment scheduling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Amelia Booking Plugin, WPML Multilingual CMS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian with English and Russian language options
  3. No visible forms collecting sensitive personal data on the homepage
  4. Contact phone numbers are clearly displayed in footer
  5. Privacy policy page is present but cookie consent is missing
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information published
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and theme with tracking pixels for marketing
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Divi theme, supported by plugins for booking (Amelia) and multilingual content (WPML). It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with deferred CSS loading and asynchronous script loading improving load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tuf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tuf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.