Skip to main content

Security report for ttinteractive.com

Travel Technology Interactive · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Travel Technology Interactive is a medium-sized SaaS provider specializing in cloud-based airline passenger service systems and logistics management solutions. Their flagship product, Zenith, is a fully cloud-based passenger experience platform integrated into the CitizenPlane Operating System. The company targets mid-tier and fast-growing airlines globally, offering modular solutions to optimize airline operations, revenue, and distribution. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with common plugins and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliability and scalability. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some improvements are recommended such as updating outdated libraries and configuring analytics properly. The domain is long-established since 2002, consistent with the business history, and WHOIS data supports legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its B2B audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ttinteractive.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a leading SaaS provider in the airline technology sector, focusing on cloud-based passenger service systems. Their business model revolves around subscription-based SaaS offerings, targeting airlines and travel industry stakeholders seeking operational agility and innovation. The consolidation under the CitizenPlane brand indicates strategic brand alignment and market expansion. The company leverages partnerships and a global presence across Americas, EMEA, and APAC. Their website content and structured data reflect a clear focus on airline operations, revenue optimization, and distribution solutions. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled lead generation approach via contact forms and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities, and the Google Analytics plugin is not fully configured, which may affect data privacy and tracking accuracy. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced by updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update jQuery to the latest secure version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Properly configure or remove unused Google Analytics plugins to ensure accurate tracking and privacy compliance.
  3. Explicitly implement and verify security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Travel Technology Interactive
Description
Travel Technology Interactive provides innovative airline passenger reservation and logistics management systems. They offer a fully cloud-based passenger experience platform called Zenith, part of the CitizenPlane Operating System, supporting airlines globally with SaaS solutions.
Key services
Passenger Service System (Zenith), CitizenPlane Operating System Distribution Solution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 2.1.3, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome 6.4.0, CookieYes cookie consent plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS (inferred from AWS DNS servers)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (not fully configured)
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on airline SaaS solutions with clear branding.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed preference center.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form and social media.
  5. Security headers are not explicitly visible but HTTPS is enforced.
  6. Google Analytics plugin is present but not fully configured.
  7. Use of older jQuery version may pose security risks.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and domain age matches business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO and other common plugins, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS servers. The tech stack includes jQuery 2.1.3, Owl Carousel, and Font Awesome 6.4.0. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses a cookie consent plugin (CookieYes) with a detailed preference center, supporting GDPR compliance. Some technical debt is present due to outdated jQuery and unconfigured analytics. The site is well-structured and professionally designed, but updating libraries and improving security headers would reduce technical risks and improve overall robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ttinteractive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ttinteractive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.