Skip to main content

Security report for truck1.lt

Truck1 Sp.z.o.o. · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 4 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Truck1 Sp.z.o.o. operates a large European online marketplace specializing in the sale of used trucks, trailers, tractors, and commercial vehicles. Founded in 2003, the company has established itself as a key player in the transportation sector, offering over 150,000 listings and partnering with numerous dealers across multiple countries. The website targets businesses and individuals seeking commercial vehicles, providing a comprehensive catalog and additional services such as leasing and dealer promotions. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and marketing technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, and others, enabling extensive user behavior analysis and targeted advertising. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with appropriate security headers, reflecting a good security posture. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and explicit security or incident response policies introduces some trust concerns. Overall, the platform demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching truck1.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
60
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Truck1's market positioning as a large-scale European marketplace is supported by its multi-language and multi-country domain network, extensive vehicle categories, and dealer partnerships. The business model revolves around connecting sellers and buyers of used commercial vehicles, generating revenue through listing fees, promotional services, and leasing options. The company leverages a broad partnership ecosystem, including regional sites and dealer networks, to maintain market reach. Growth indicators include a large inventory and active marketing campaigns across multiple ad networks. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and domain transparency to strengthen business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers such as HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. Forms handling user credentials are implemented with password fields, indicating secure input handling. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, necessitating regular audits and updates. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated but could be enhanced with clearer policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and reduce unnecessary tracking to enhance privacy compliance.
  4. Improve accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Truck1 Sp.z.o.o.
VAT number
PL7011085742
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Truck1 Sp.z.o.o.
Description
Daugiau nei 150,000 pasiūlymus dėl sunkvežimiai pardavimas. Pirkti naudotų ir naujų sunkvežimių, priekabų, traktoriai palankiomis kainomis ant Truck1!
Key services
Used truck sales, Trailer sales, Tractor sales, Commercial vehicle listings, Dealer services, Leasing options
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Taboola, Criteo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads UET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads UET, Twitter conversion tracking, Taboola Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo, Taboola, Bing Ads, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter conversion tracking, Taboola Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts
  3. Comprehensive multi-language and multi-country presence
  4. Strong business branding and structured data markup
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info publicly available
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front end with multiple asynchronous scripts for analytics and advertising. It integrates with major ad networks and tracking services, including Google, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn, Bing, and Taboola. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. While no specific CMS was identified, the site uses custom CSS and JavaScript bundles. Performance is moderate, likely impacted by numerous third-party scripts. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical risks include dependency on multiple external services and potential privacy concerns from extensive tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with truck1.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review truck1.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.