Skip to main content

Security report for truck1-ao.com

Truck1 Sp.z.o.o. · Transportation · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Truck1 Sp.z.o.o. operates an international online marketplace specializing in the buying and selling of used trucks, commercial vehicles, and construction machinery, with localized versions such as the Angola site. The platform connects sellers and buyers globally, offering extensive vehicle categories and dealer services. The company is established since 2003 and headquartered in Poland. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and advertising technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, and Criteo, integrated via Google Tag Manager. The site is HTTPS secured and mobile optimized, providing a good user experience and professional design. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, indicating potential compliance gaps. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching truck1-ao.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Truck1 holds a niche market position as a specialized marketplace for used commercial vehicles and machinery, targeting businesses and individuals in transportation and construction sectors. Its business model revolves around listing services, dealer promotions, and advertising. The company leverages a broad partnership ecosystem with multiple country-specific domains, enhancing its global reach. Revenue likely derives from paid listings and promotional services. The platform's multilingual support and extensive vehicle categories indicate a mature and scalable operation. Growth indicators include continuous updates and integration of marketing technologies. Strategic observations suggest focusing on strengthening trust signals and compliance to enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, absence of exposed sensitive data, and use of consent management for analytics. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security incident handling. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for an e-commerce platform but can be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible from the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS registration data to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Truck1 Sp.z.o.o.
VAT number
PL7011085742
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Truck1 Sp.z.o.o.
Description
Caminões, semi-reboques e equipamentos de construção usados em um só site. ✅ Conecte-se com os melhores vendedores de veículos comerciais em todo o mundo.
Key services
Vehicle and machinery listings, Dealer and seller profiles, Advertising and promotional services, Search and comparison tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, Criteo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Taboola, Microsoft Bing Ads
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Criteo, Taboola, Microsoft Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language options.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active commercial site.
  3. Strong use of tracking and advertising technologies.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. Contact information is present in structured data and login forms.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and multiple security-related scripts.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front end with multiple asynchronous tracking and advertising scripts from major providers like Google, Facebook, TikTok, and Criteo. Google Tag Manager is used for tag management. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design with preloaded fonts and CSS. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with some heavy external scripts but generally good SEO metadata and structured data usage. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may impact privacy and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with truck1-ao.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review truck1-ao.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.