Skip to main content

Security report for triumph.com

Triumph Intertrade AG · Retail · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Triumph Intertrade AG operates a mature and well-established e-commerce platform specializing in lingerie and related apparel, primarily targeting the German market. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, rich content, and strong brand consistency, supported by a comprehensive customer loyalty program and active social media presence. The technical infrastructure leverages modern e-commerce technologies including Salesforce Commerce Cloud and Cloudflare for hosting and delivery, with integrated marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and CQuotient. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate on the main domain significantly undermines the site's security posture, exposing users to potential risks. Additionally, a subdomain takeover vulnerability on blog.triumph.com presents a notable security concern. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, with clear contact information and incident response channels available. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching triumph.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Triumph as a leading lingerie brand with a strong European presence, offering a broad product range including bras, slips, shapewear, swimwear, and accessories. The business model is focused on direct-to-consumer e-commerce complemented by physical stores and a loyalty program (MyTriumph). The company benefits from a mature domain and consistent branding, with strategic partnerships evident through related domains for store location, appointment booking, and a sister brand (Sloggi). Marketing efforts are supported by extensive tracking and retargeting technologies, indicating a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The absence of physical addresses in the content suggests a focus on online sales, with customer support accessible via phone and email. The domain's WHOIS data confirms strong domain protection and a medium expiry risk, consistent with a reputable enterprise.

Security posture

Security analysis reveals critical weaknesses, primarily the lack of HTTPS on the main domain, which is a fundamental security requirement for any e-commerce site. This exposes the site and its users to interception and data tampering risks. The presence of security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and a restrictive Content Security Policy is positive but insufficient without SSL. The subdomain takeover vulnerability on blog.triumph.com is a significant risk that could allow attackers to hijack the subdomain for malicious purposes. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found, and incident response contact is provided via a whistleblowing email. The site lacks HSTS and OCSP stapling, further reducing its security robustness. Immediate remediation of SSL and subdomain issues is recommended to elevate the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting modern protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) on all domains and subdomains.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Mitigate the subdomain takeover risk by properly configuring or removing the vulnerable blog.triumph.com subdomain.
  4. Enhance security headers by adding X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Ensure all forms and data collection points enforce secure transmission and validate inputs.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Salesforce Commerce Cloud, leveraging Cloudflare for content delivery and protection. It uses modern web technologies including responsive CSS, JavaScript frameworks, and lazy loading for images. Marketing and analytics integrations are comprehensive, including Google Tag Manager and CQuotient for user behavior tracking and recommendations. However, performance metrics are unavailable, limiting assessment of load times and resource optimization. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and SEO-friendly meta tags. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are good, supporting a positive user experience. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of SSL is a critical technical risk that must be addressed promptly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with triumph.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review triumph.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.