Skip to main content

Security report for trhyales.cz

LDEkonom · Retail · Czech Republic

High risk. 14 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trhy Aleš is a Czech-based small business specializing in the complete organization of various types of sales markets and fairs. The website provides event calendars, registration options for vendors, and informational content primarily targeting vendors and customers interested in local sales markets. The business appears to be operated or managed by an entity named LDEkonom, as indicated by copyright and author metadata. The market position is likely local or regional, focusing on retail event facilitation. Technically, the website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and jQuery UI libraries, along with custom JavaScript modules. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are implemented with IP anonymization to track user interactions. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and overall security posture. The website design and navigation are good, though mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity with HTTPS and anonymized analytics but lacks security headers and cookie consent. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification, reducing trust scores. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy policy is available as a PDF document, indicating some compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security headers, cookie consent implementation, and verification of domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance. Strategic improvements in these areas will strengthen the security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

14 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trhyales.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trhy Aleš operates in the retail event organization sector, focusing on sales markets and fairs in the Czech Republic. The business model revolves around organizing events, managing vendor registrations, and providing information to participants. The company targets vendors and local customers interested in attending or selling at these markets. The presence of a calendar and registration system suggests a transactional component, likely generating revenue through vendor fees or event participation charges. The company appears to be small-sized with a localized market presence. The partnership with LDEkonom, indicated by copyright and author metadata, may provide administrative or operational support. The website's ecosystem includes external domains for fonts and analytics but no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified. Growth potential lies in expanding event offerings and improving digital presence.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy-conscious tracking. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The use of older jQuery versions may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. No cookie consent mechanism is present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The lack of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating limited security governance visibility. Overall, the site is functional but requires enhancements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to enhance trust and legitimacy perception.
  4. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Develop and publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve security governance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LDEkonom
Description
Zajišťování kompletní organizace všech typů prodejních trhů.
Key services
Complete organization of all types of sales markets, Event calendar and registration for vendors, Information and FAQ for participants
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, jQuery UI 1.10.3, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language focused on organizing sales markets and events.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  4. Privacy policy is present as a PDF document but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. Use of older jQuery versions may pose minor security risks.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used with IP anonymization.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with jQuery 1.11.0 and jQuery UI 1.10.3, which are somewhat outdated and may pose security risks if not maintained. Custom JavaScript modules (PKWin.js and related) are used for UI components such as menus, sliders, and image boxes. Google Fonts and Google-hosted libraries are used for styling and functionality. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated with IP anonymization, indicating some privacy awareness. The site is served over HTTPS, but no advanced security headers were detected. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in modernizing the tech stack and enhancing accessibility and mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trhyales.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trhyales.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.