Skip to main content

Security report for treedom.net

Treedom s.r.l. · Non-profit · Italy

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Treedom s.r.l. operates an online platform dedicated to environmental sustainability by enabling individuals and companies to plant or gift trees and track their impact. The company positions itself as a niche leader in green business solutions and reforestation projects, targeting environmentally conscious consumers and businesses. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear information about its services and mission. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses Iubenda for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, indicating room for improvement in security transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the website is trustworthy and safe, with no adult or questionable content, but the absence of WHOIS data slightly reduces domain trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to strengthen security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching treedom.net

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention treedom.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,593
Employees
6
Customers
3,581
Third parties
6
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2026-01-10 · 14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for treedom.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –treedom.net2026-01-10
  • –beta.treedom.net2026-01-10
  • –treedom.net2026-01-10
  • –www.treedom.net2025-12-06
  • –treedom.net2025-08-08

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Treedom operates in the non-profit sector focused on sustainability and reforestation. Its business model revolves around selling tree planting and gifting services with an emphasis on environmental, social, and economic benefits. The company targets both individual consumers and corporate clients seeking green branding and sustainability solutions. The website content and structured data confirm a medium-sized Italian company with consistent branding and clear contact information. The use of modern web technologies and compliance tools suggests a forward-looking approach to digital presence. However, the lack of WHOIS data and security policy documents indicates potential gaps in transparency and regulatory compliance documentation. The company appears well-positioned in its niche with opportunities to enhance trust through improved security disclosures and domain registration transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, limiting user awareness of the company's security practices and readiness. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for transparency and community engagement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with recommendations to publish security policies, implement security headers, and establish formal incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve WHOIS domain registration transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to enhance domain trustworthiness.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Treedom s.r.l.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Treedom s.r.l.
Description
Choose from various species and plant or gift a tree with Treedom. Make the world greener and discover the environmental, social and economic benefits.
Key services
Tree planting, Gift a tree, Business sustainability solutions, Reforestation projects
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda (cookie consent), WebP images
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Iubenda cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an established business domain.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and good privacy compliance tools.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent with business identity.
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern and scalable frontend framework. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Iubenda for cookie consent management, showing integration with popular marketing and compliance tools. Images are served in WebP format for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No CMS or hosting provider information was explicitly detected. Performance appears fast with preloading of key resources. Technical debt is minimal, but security header implementation is lacking. Opportunities exist to enhance security posture and improve domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with treedom.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review treedom.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.