Skip to main content

Security report for trayto.com

Assiste · Transportation · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Assiste is a Brazilian company specializing in fleet maintenance systems and related technical advisory services. Their website presents a professional image with a clear focus on B2B clients needing fleet management and industrial maintenance solutions. The site offers multiple contact channels including a contact form protected by Google reCAPTCHA, email addresses, phone numbers, and a physical address in Piracicaba, Brazil. The company integrates Google Maps for location display and maintains a LinkedIn presence, indicating a moderate digital maturity. Technically, the site uses a mix of modern and legacy technologies including Bootstrap and an older jQuery version, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Security measures include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lack explicit security headers and use of outdated libraries pose some risks. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trayto.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Assiste operates in the transportation and technology sectors, providing software and consulting services for fleet and industrial maintenance. Their market positioning is focused on Brazilian businesses requiring operational efficiency in fleet management. The business model is primarily B2B, offering software solutions like SISMA and consulting services. The company leverages partnerships with agencies like Agência MKP for web development. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio of solutions and integration capabilities. The website content and structure support a professional image but lack detailed corporate information such as founding year or certifications, which could enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to protect forms from spam. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduce the overall security level. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. The site would benefit from updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other third-party libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Assiste
Description
Assiste - Assessoria em Sistemas Técnicos, Sistema de Manutenção de Frotas, Controle de Pneus, Manutenção básica, Controle de combustíveis
Key services
SISMA - Sistema de Manutenção de Frota, CDI - Catálogo Digital Interativo, RENOVE - Renovação de Frota, INDICA - Indicadores, SMI - Sistema de Manutenção Industrial, PLUMA - Planejamento das Operações de Equipamentos Agrícolas, Consultoria, Integrações
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Isotope, Flowplayer, ScrollReveal, Animate.css, Google Fonts (Roboto, Google Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Maps API with API key
  • Form fields have required attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional business site for Assiste, a Brazilian fleet maintenance system provider.
  2. Contact page includes multiple contact methods: form, emails, phone numbers, physical address.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  4. Uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on contact form.
  5. Includes Google Maps integration with API key showing company location.
  6. Uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  9. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  10. No advertising networks detected beyond Google Analytics and Tag Manager.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Bootstrap framework for responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party libraries and services such as Google Maps API, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager. Hosting is provided by Locaweb, a Brazilian hosting provider, as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with some legacy scripts that could be modernized. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, the lack of modern security headers and use of outdated libraries represent technical debt and potential risks. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security posture, and enhance privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trayto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trayto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.