Skip to main content

Security report for travelhouseuk.co.uk

TravelhouseUK · Transportation · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TravelhouseUK is a London-based travel agency offering a wide range of travel services including flight bookings, holiday packages, and Umrah packages. With over two decades of experience, the company positions itself as a trusted travel partner for UK residents, providing competitive pricing and personalized travel solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and features comprehensive content and interactive booking forms. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, and employs security measures like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of explicit cookie consent and security headers indicates room for improvement in privacy compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming issues, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the overall professionalism and legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching travelhouseuk.co.uk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TravelhouseUK operates in the transportation and hospitality sectors, targeting travelers from the UK seeking affordable and reliable travel options. The business model revolves around online bookings with value-added services like 'Book Now Pay Later' and loyalty rewards. The company maintains a strong market position supported by certifications (ATOL, ABTA) and a high volume of positive customer reviews. Its digital presence is supported by active social media channels and a well-structured website. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a minor concern but likely a technicality related to domain naming conventions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is partial, with no visible cookie consent mechanism, which may pose GDPR compliance risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy Directive.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Moresand Limited
Registration number
02114691
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TravelhouseUK
Description
TravelhouseUK is a London-based travel agency with over 23 years of experience offering cheap flights, hotels, holidays, Umrah packages, and personalized travel services. They provide competitive pricing and last-minute flight bookings with a focus on customer satisfaction and comprehensive travel assistance.
Key services
Flight bookings (economy, business, first class), Holiday packages, Umrah packages, Last-minute flight deals, Book Now Pay Later payment option, Fly & Earn loyalty program
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA v3, Typeahead.js, Moment.js, ProvideSupport live chat
Frameworks
Bootstrap 5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, ProvideSupport live chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming error; domain likely registered without 'www'.
  4. Strong business presence with certifications and customer reviews.
  5. No explicit privacy cookie consent banner found, potential GDPR compliance gap.
  6. Multiple contact methods and social media links present.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Security headers not explicitly detected; recommend adding for enhanced security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack featuring Bootstrap 5, jQuery, and FontAwesome, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Integration with Google Fonts and analytics tools is well implemented. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. Date pickers and typeahead inputs enhance usability. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but can benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with travelhouseuk.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review travelhouseuk.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.