Skip to main content

Security report for travelgate.hu

TravelGATE Kft · Transportation · Hungary

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TravelGATE Kft operates a specialized cloud-based business travel management system tailored for Hungarian travel agencies and tour operators. Their platform offers comprehensive features including online travel offer search, booking, client and order management, and marketing tools. The company holds reputable certifications and maintains an active social media presence, positioning itself as a trusted provider in the Hungarian travel software market. Technically, the website employs a mix of legacy and modern JavaScript libraries, with room for modernization and security enhancements. Security posture is moderate, with cookie consent mechanisms and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacking advanced HTTP security headers and incident response contacts. Overall, the website is professional, compliant with GDPR, and provides clear business and contact information, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching travelgate.hu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets Hungarian travel agencies and tour operators, offering a SaaS platform that integrates multiple tour operator offers and provides tools for client management and marketing. Their business model relies on B2B software subscriptions and partnerships with travel providers like MSC Cruises and Adriatic.hr. The presence of certifications such as Dun & Bradstreet and MUISZ membership enhances credibility. The company demonstrates growth through continuous feature additions and marketing campaigns. Their ecosystem includes partnerships with MailChimp for newsletters and Google Analytics for tracking. The website content and partner listings indicate a well-established market position with a focus on Hungarian travel industry needs.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level. It implements cookie consent with detailed categorization and respects user privacy preferences, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a compliance and operational gap. No visible signs of malware or phishing were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with modern best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TravelGATE Kft
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TravelGATE Kft
Description
TravelGate offers a comprehensive cloud-based business travel management system tailored for Hungarian travel agencies and tour operators, including online booking, client and order management, offer sending, and various other features.
Key services
Online travel offer search, Offer request functionality, Client and order management, Offer sending, Web hosting and custom website development, Newsletter and marketing campaign services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.2, Google Maps API, CookieYes cookie consent, Owl Carousel, Revolution Slider, jQuery UI, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with customization options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailChimp, Google Adwords, Facebook campaigns
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  3. Multiple certifications and trust badges are displayed.
  4. Social media presence is active and linked.
  5. No security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  6. Uses older jQuery version which may have vulnerabilities.
  7. No visible incident response or security contact information.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy (jQuery 1.8.2) and modern JavaScript libraries such as Owl Carousel, Revolution Slider, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Google Maps API and Google Analytics are integrated for mapping and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and professional design. However, the use of outdated libraries and lack of HTTP security headers indicate technical debt and potential security risks. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with travelgate.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review travelgate.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.