Skip to main content

Security report for transport360.eu

Transport360°.EU · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transport360°.EU is a small freight forwarding and logistics company specializing in international cargo transportation, customs clearance, and warehousing services across Europe, the US, EU, and CIS regions. With over 10 years of experience, the company operates warehouses in Riga, Vilnius, and Helsinki, offering competitive pricing and a range of services including air cargo delivery and groupage cargo carriage. The website is built on WordPress and integrates standard plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA to facilitate secure customer interactions. Analytics are handled primarily through Yandex Metrica, with Google Analytics plugin present but not configured. Security posture is moderate, with some best practices like reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policies. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image suitable for its target audience of businesses and individuals seeking freight services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transport360.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an experienced and cost-effective freight forwarding service provider with a focus on European and international markets. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive logistics solutions including customs clearance and warehousing, targeting SMEs and larger clients needing reliable cargo transport. The presence of multilingual navigation indicates an intent to serve diverse European markets. The lack of detailed business registration data or certifications on the site suggests a small to medium enterprise with a focus on operational services rather than marketing or brand expansion. The company’s use of standard web technologies and analytics tools reflects a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The site does not disclose any security or incident response policies, nor does it provide vulnerability disclosure information. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, which may indicate incomplete setup or oversight. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content, improvements in security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response readiness are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Configure or remove unused analytics plugins to reduce attack surface and improve site performance.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Transport360°.EU
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transport360°.EU
Description
Over 10 years of experience in freight forwarding and warehousing. Truck cargo transportation over Europe. Air cargo delivery all across US, EU and CIS for most compatible prices. Low budget groupage cargo carriage from single carton to pallet. Warehouses in Riga, Vilnius and Helsinki.
Key services
International cargo transportation, Customs clearance (import, export, transit declaration T1), Warehousing in Riga, Vilnius, Helsinki, Cargo consolidation and reloading, Goods packaging, Air cargo delivery across US, EU, CIS, Low budget groupage cargo carriage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Contact Form 7 plugin, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Yandex Metrica
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrica
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrica
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrica, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based freight forwarding service site with multilingual support (English, Latvian, Russian).
  2. Multiple contact forms with Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration to prevent spam.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Use of Yandex Metrica for analytics and tracking.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies in HTML source.
  6. Site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization info.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address in Riga.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. No evidence of adult or questionable content; content is business and logistics focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.2 with standard plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and loads external scripts from trusted CDNs including Google and jsDelivr. The site includes structured data in JSON-LD format for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility is basic but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar (GoDaddy.com, LLC). The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy disclosures, indicating some technical debt and areas for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transport360.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transport360.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.