Skip to main content

Security report for transpole.fr

Transportation · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

67/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website transpole.fr currently returns a 502 Bad Gateway error served by Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, indicating backend server or configuration issues that prevent content delivery. Due to this, no business content, metadata, or contact information is accessible for analysis. The domain is well-established, registered since 1997 with a reputable registrar and consistent WHOIS data, suggesting a legitimate transportation-related business likely operating in France. However, the lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the company's digital maturity, security posture, or compliance status. The hosting on Microsoft Azure indicates a modern cloud infrastructure, but the current outage represents a critical availability risk. Security posture cannot be evaluated due to missing headers and lack of HTTPS confirmation. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact or incident response information is available. Overall, the site is currently non-functional, resulting in a low AI score and incomplete analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transpole.fr

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
67

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention transpole.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,797
Employees
0
Customers
1,790
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
19%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for transpole.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Based on domain registration and domain name, the business is likely a transportation service operating in France, possibly public transit or regional transport. The domain age (since 1997) indicates a mature entity. No direct business model, revenue streams, or partnerships can be identified from the inaccessible website content. The lack of accessible information limits insights into competitive positioning or growth indicators. The company likely serves a regional or national audience in the transportation sector. No subsidiaries or parent company information is available. The absence of visible trust indicators or certifications on the site further limits business intelligence.

Security posture

The current security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the website's inaccessibility. No security headers or HTTPS status were detected from the provided data. The site is hosted on Microsoft Azure, which generally supports strong security practices, but the 502 error indicates backend instability or misconfiguration. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published. Privacy compliance indicators such as GDPR policies or cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The lack of accessible content and security metadata represents a significant security and compliance gap. Immediate remediation of the backend error and implementation of security best practices are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website availability by resolving the 502 Bad Gateway error with hosting provider or backend infrastructure team.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including security contact channels.
  5. Enhance website content quality and accessibility to improve user trust, SEO, and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 502 Bad Gateway error served by Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2, indicating backend server issues or misconfiguration causing content inaccessibility. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to a 502 Bad Gateway error.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or content available for analysis.
  3. No contact information, policies, or business details are present on the page.
  4. Hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure.
  5. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with no privacy protection.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status could be determined from the provided data.
  7. No external links, forms, or scripts detected due to minimal content.
  8. Content safety is rated safe as no adult or explicit content is present.
  9. Analysis is incomplete due to website inaccessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway v2, indicating use of cloud infrastructure. However, the site currently returns a 502 Bad Gateway error, indicating backend server or application issues. No CMS, frameworks, or client-side technologies could be detected due to minimal HTML content. No metadata, scripts, or external resources are present. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed. The domain uses name servers ns1.as44099.net and ns2.as44099.net, which appear consistent with the hosting setup. The technical debt includes lack of redundancy or failover to prevent downtime. Modernization opportunities include restoring backend stability, implementing security headers, and improving SEO metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transpole.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transpole.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.