Skip to main content

Security report for transocean.ee

Transocean Eesti OÜ · Transportation · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transocean Eesti OÜ is a well-established maritime logistics company based in Tallinn, Estonia, with branch offices in Latvia and Lithuania. Founded in 1993, it offers a comprehensive range of transportation services including container, RoRo, road, air, project cargo transport, and tank-container logistics. The company holds official representation and agency agreements with major international shipping lines, positioning it as a reputable player in the Baltic maritime logistics market. The website reflects a professional digital presence with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting businesses requiring freight and logistics services in the Baltic region and beyond. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and APIs, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, despite having a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting the legitimacy of the website and company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transocean.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on maritime logistics and freight forwarding. Its business model leverages partnerships with global shipping lines to provide container and RoRo transport, project cargo handling, and related logistics services. The presence of branch offices in neighboring Baltic countries indicates regional expansion and market penetration. The website's content and partner links demonstrate a strong partnership ecosystem, enhancing service offerings and market reach. The target customers are businesses requiring reliable shipping and logistics solutions, particularly in the Baltic States, CIS, and Central Asia. The company’s longevity and official licenses contribute to its competitive advantage and market credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected. Contact forms appear standard but no explicit security or incident response policies are published, indicating potential gaps in transparency and preparedness. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Facebook are present, with moderate user tracking levels. Privacy compliance is partial, with no privacy or terms of service pages found, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and disclose an incident response policy with dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TRANSOCEAN Eesti OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transocean Eesti OÜ
Description
Transocean Eesti OU is a modern maritime logistics company, established in 1993. The company is located in Tallinn, Estonia having branch offices in Latvia and Lithuania. They provide a wide range of transportation services such as container, RoRo, road, air and project cargo transport, and tank-container logistics. They represent and are agents for several international shipping lines.
Key services
Container transport, RoRo transport, Ferry tickets, Project cargo, Tank container logistics, Road transport, Rail transport, Customs clearance & warehousing, Port agency
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, jQuery
Frameworks
Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Secure contact forms (implied by WordPress standard)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Multiple contact methods and physical address provided.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Security headers are not explicitly detected.
  6. Google Analytics and Facebook tracking scripts are present.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. WHOIS data consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Avia Framework and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-friendly infrastructure. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Maps API for enhanced user experience. The presence of jQuery and Facebook SDK supports interactive and social media features. Performance is moderate, with some inline scripts and lazy loading images optimizing load times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements detected. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is standard for a corporate logistics website, with opportunities to enhance security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transocean.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transocean.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.