Skip to main content

Security report for translated.com

Translated · Technology · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Translated is a well-established professional language solutions provider founded in 2000, offering expert human translation services enhanced by AI technology. The company serves a large global client base with over 379,817 customers and delivers services in 236 languages across 40 areas of expertise. Their market position is strong, supported by high customer satisfaction and a broad portfolio including enterprise solutions and developer tools. Technically, the website is modern, fast, and mobile-optimized, leveraging advanced analytics and consent management tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the site reflects a mature, credible business with excellent content quality and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching translated.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention translated.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
14,758
Employees
0
Customers
14,706
Third parties
52
Weak passwords
12%

15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for translated.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Translated operates in the technology sector focusing on translation and localization services. Their business model combines human expertise with AI-powered tools, targeting businesses needing scalable, high-quality multilingual content. The company has a global footprint with offices in Italy and the US, and a strong partnership ecosystem including their AI platform Lara Translate. Their revenue streams likely include direct translation services, enterprise contracts, and API usage fees. The presence of numerous testimonials and case studies indicates a well-established client trust and a focus on quality and innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security best practices in forms, and cookie consent management via Cookiebot. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of multiple analytics and monitoring tools suggests active performance and security monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response plan with dedicated security contact channels.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Ensure all recommended security headers are fully implemented and documented.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and analytics tools for security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Translated
VAT number
IT07173521001
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Translated
Description
Translated provides professional language solutions for your business. We are industry experts who deliver consistent quality translations as fast as you need them, in 236 languages and 40 areas of expertise. Save time and money, request your free quote.
Key services
Professional Translation, Enterprise Solutions, Developers' Tools (APIs for localization and machine translation)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by app.3e900ff93f02fa85c4e2.js), Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Dynatrace, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Google Tag Manager
Platforms
AWS (implied by AWS DNS servers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Use of consent management (Cookiebot)
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Pingdom RUM, Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, Dynatrace
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Pingdom RUM, Google Analytics (via GTM), Heap Analytics, Dynatrace
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong presence of structured data and SEO best practices
  3. Multiple contact points with global phone numbers and addresses
  4. Use of modern analytics and consent management tools
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks (likely React), hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates advanced analytics and monitoring tools such as Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Dynatrace, and Microsoft Clarity. It employs responsive design for excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is robust and supports high performance and scalability. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and well-executed with minor opportunities for enhanced security header coverage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with translated.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review translated.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.