Skip to main content

Security report for transitionleytonstone.org.uk

Transition Leytonstone · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transition Leytonstone is a community-driven initiative focused on environmental sustainability and improving the local area of Leytonstone. The website serves as an informational platform to engage local residents and environmentally conscious individuals. It operates as a small non-profit entity with a grassroots approach to community involvement. The site is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's hosting and content management capabilities, which provides a moderate level of technical infrastructure suitable for small organizations. The website is accessible and mobile-optimized, but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing critical security headers and policies. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies indicates a gap in compliance and user trust mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rule violations, which raises legitimacy concerns but does not necessarily indicate malicious intent. Overall, the site is functional and serves its community purpose but requires improvements in security, compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transitionleytonstone.org.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a local environmental and sustainability group within the Leytonstone community, targeting residents and activists interested in ecological issues. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on community engagement and awareness rather than revenue generation. The website content is relevant and consistent with its mission but lacks detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals. The absence of contact details and formal policies limits its credibility from a business perspective. The technical ecosystem is Wix-based, which simplifies management but may limit scalability and customization. No partnerships or related domains were identified, indicating a standalone community initiative.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response contacts, or security policies was found, indicating a low maturity level in security governance. The WHOIS data absence and domain registration irregularity add to the risk profile, although the site content does not show signs of malicious activity. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure up-to-date components.
  5. Consider resolving domain registration issues to ensure legitimacy and avoid potential trust concerns.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transition Leytonstone
Description
Transition Leytonstone - part of the Transition Network. A community initiative that aims to make Leytonstone the best and most sustainable place it can be. We care about the environment - and each other.
Key services
Community environmental initiatives, Sustainability awareness, Local events and activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML or scripts.
  6. WHOIS lookup failed due to domain naming rules violation; no registrar or registrant info available.
  7. Site content is community-focused, environmentally oriented, and safe for general audiences.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Wix platform assets.
  9. Site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  10. No evidence of incident response or security policy documentation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and hosting infrastructure. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 with responsive design elements, providing good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, typical of Wix-hosted sites, with no significant technical debt observed. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but lacks advanced structured data or rich snippets. Accessibility features are minimal, with scope for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. No custom backend or advanced frameworks detected, indicating a simple technical stack suitable for small community sites.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transitionleytonstone.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transitionleytonstone.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.