Skip to main content

Security report for transguarddelivery.com

Transguard Group · Transportation · United Arab Emirates

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transguard Delivery Service, a subsidiary of Transguard Group, operates as a delivery service provider across the UAE, offering express, economy, and standard delivery options with real-time tracking and 24/7 customer support. The company targets SMEs and general customers, positioning itself as a reliable and technology-enabled logistics provider within the UAE market. The website is built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and branding appear professional and consistent with a legitimate business. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical implementation and user experience but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transguarddelivery.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages its parent brand Transguard Group to provide delivery services with a focus on convenience, certainty, and personalized customer experience. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and individuals needing reliable parcel delivery within the UAE. The market position is strong regionally with nationwide coverage and technology-enabled tracking. The website supports business growth through newsletter subscriptions and social media engagement. However, the lack of visible company emails and WHOIS data may impact trust for some users. The company could benefit from publishing more detailed business credentials and certifications to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms for data collection, which are positive security indicators. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates partial compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, privacy controls, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Transguard Group
Description
Transguard Delivery, a Transguard Group company, provides safe and secure delivery services throughout the UAE using the latest tracking and tracing technology. Services include Express, Economy, and Standard delivery options.
Key services
Express Delivery (Same Day – 4 Hours), Economy Delivery (Same Day – 9 Hours), Standard Delivery (Next Business Day – 24 Hours)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Slider, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active business site.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and is mobile optimized.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected despite presence of privacy policy page.
  5. Contact information is present but no direct company emails found in visible content.
  6. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn is linked.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to delivery services in UAE.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Slick Slider for interactive content. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with clear navigation and structured content. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility compliance and SEO optimization. The absence of hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, indicating a relatively modern and maintainable technical stack.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transguarddelivery.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transguarddelivery.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.