Skip to main content

Security report for transerta.lv

SIA "TRANSERTA" · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transerta is a Latvian-based full-service logistics and international freight transport company offering a range of services including full and partial cargo transport, terminal cargo services, oversized and heavy cargo transport, warehousing, and customs formalities. The company targets businesses requiring efficient and cost-effective freight solutions across the European Union and CIS countries. The website is built on WordPress with multilingual support, providing clear service descriptions and contact options, reflecting a medium-sized regional logistics provider with a consistent brand presence. Technically, the website employs a standard WordPress stack with common plugins such as WPML for multilingual content and Contact Form 7 for customer inquiries. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled and forms use nonce tokens, but there is an absence of security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies and missing security headers reduce the overall security and compliance score. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain trust analysis, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, adding security headers such as CSP and HSTS, maintaining up-to-date software versions, and considering a vulnerability disclosure policy to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transerta.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Transerta operates in the transportation sector, focusing on international freight and logistics services primarily within the EU and CIS regions. The company leverages a service-based business model targeting commercial clients needing reliable cargo transport and related logistics solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in a professional team with industry experience, a network of terminals across Europe, and specialized services for oversized and heavy cargo. The presence of client logos indicates established partnerships and a credible market position. The website content and service offerings suggest a medium-sized enterprise with steady operations but no explicit data on revenue or growth. The multilingual website supports broader regional outreach. The lack of visible certifications or security policies may impact trust with privacy-conscious clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and contact forms include nonce tokens to prevent CSRF attacks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting risks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is present, which limits the company's readiness to handle security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may expose the company to GDPR non-compliance risks. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, the security posture requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "TRANSERTA"
Description
Pilna servisa loģistikas uzņēmums, piedāvā visizdevīgāko kravas piegādes veidu gan materiālā, gan laika ziņā. Nodrošina starptautiskos kravu pārvadājumus, noliktavas pakalpojumus un muitas formalitātes Eiropas Savienības un NVS valstīs.
Key services
Pilno un salikto kravu pārvadājumi, Terminālu kravu pārvadājumi, Negabarīta un smagsvara kravu pārvadājumi, Noliktavas pakalpojumi, Muitas formalitātes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.14, jQuery 3.5.1, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Contact Form 7, Simple Lightbox, CargoPress theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact forms with nonce tokens

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional logistics and transport service provider based in Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone and email.
  5. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for multilingual and contact forms.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic plugins.
  10. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.6.14 using the CargoPress theme and several plugins including WPML for multilingual support and Contact Form 7 for forms. The tech stack includes jQuery 3.5.1 and Simple Lightbox for UI enhancements. The site loads moderate-sized images and uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of advanced performance optimization such as caching or CDN usage. SEO is basic with meta tags and alternate hreflang links but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small to medium WordPress site but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transerta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transerta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.