Skip to main content

Security report for transdevna.jobs

Transdev North America, Inc. · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Transdev North America, Inc. operates a comprehensive career portal focused on transportation jobs across North America. As the largest private-sector provider of multiple transportation modes including transit, rail, and on-demand services, the company targets job seekers interested in diverse roles such as drivers, management, safety, and technical positions. The website provides detailed information about career opportunities, benefits, and hiring processes, supported by a consistent brand presence and trust indicators such as an EEO statement and a Code of Business Conduct. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks like Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with integrations for Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and other marketing tools. However, performance is slow and accessibility is basic. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of security headers, and missing DNS security records, which poses significant risks to user data and trust. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy, but GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect users and enhance credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching transdevna.jobs

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Transdev North America holds a strong market position as a leading private transportation provider in North America, leveraging a broad portfolio of transit and rail services. Its business model focuses on workforce development and talent acquisition to support operational excellence. The company benefits from a diverse partnership ecosystem including talent platforms and health plan providers. Growth indicators include active recruitment campaigns and veteran hiring initiatives. The website reflects a mature digital presence but lacks advanced security and compliance maturity, which could impact customer trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic partnerships with platforms like iCIMS and Blue Cross Blue Shield Illinois enhance service delivery and employee benefits transparency.

Security posture

The current security posture is low due to critical issues such as the absence of a valid SSL certificate, no HTTPS enforcement, and missing security headers. DNS records lack DMARC and CAA, increasing risks of email spoofing and unauthorized certificate issuance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, limiting transparency and preparedness. While no vulnerable libraries or subdomain takeover risks were detected, the lack of basic TLS security and HTTP security headers exposes the site to man-in-the-middle attacks and data interception. Privacy compliance is minimal with cookie consent but no explicit GDPR adherence. The company should prioritize SSL deployment, DNS security enhancements, and publish security policies to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Configure DNS records for DMARC, SPF, and CAA to enhance email and certificate security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a Vue.js framework, indicating a modern JavaScript single-page application architecture. It uses Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The hosting is on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS nameservers. Performance is slow with a load time over 13 seconds and a large page size (~262 KB) with 111 resources, suggesting optimization opportunities. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and labels but no advanced features detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a critical technical risk. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with transdevna.jobs. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review transdevna.jobs.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.