Skip to main content

Security report for tpilet.ee

Transportation · Estonia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tpilet.ee is an Estonian online platform specializing in the sale of bus tickets and providing bus timetable information. It serves primarily bus travelers within Estonia, offering services such as one-way and return ticket purchases, ticket returns, and corporate client agreements. The website is positioned as a key player in the Estonian transportation ticketing market, leveraging e-commerce to facilitate travel planning and ticketing. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and JavaScript, with integration of analytics tools such as Amplitude and Google Analytics. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, although accessibility features are basic. The use of HTTPS ensures secure communications, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place to comply with basic privacy requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners, but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business, indicating a legitimate and consistent domain registration. Overall, the website presents a professional and functional platform with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and accessibility. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tpilet.ee

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tpilet.ee operates in the transportation sector, focusing on bus ticket sales within Estonia. Its business model centers on e-commerce, targeting individual travelers and corporate clients. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive ticketing options and integration of timetable information, facilitating convenient travel planning. Revenue streams are primarily from ticket sales and corporate agreements. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct customer engagement via the website. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded service offerings. Partnerships with bus operators and payment processors are implied but not explicitly detailed in the content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear basic, with no visible privacy policy or data protection officer contact. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, necessitating clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is functional but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and publish terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen technical security.
  4. Develop and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Improve website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online platform for purchasing bus tickets and viewing bus timetables in Estonia.
Key services
Bus ticket sales, Bus timetables, Ticket returns, Corporate client agreements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Amplitude Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Amplitude, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Amplitude
Marketing tools
Amplitude
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. JavaScript is required for full functionality, with clear user guidance if disabled.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with accept/decline options.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information includes a phone number and a company email address.
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools is evident.
  7. No social media links or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  9. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern React-based front-end with JavaScript-heavy interactivity, requiring JavaScript enabled browsers for full functionality. Analytics integration includes Amplitude and Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature approach to user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and CSS. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the content. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and formal privacy documentation suggests areas for modernization and compliance enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tpilet.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tpilet.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.