Skip to main content

Security report for toprent.com

toprent.lv · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Toprent.lv operates as a regional car rental service primarily targeting customers in the Baltic states, including Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. The company offers an online platform for vehicle rentals with multilingual support, catering to both local and international clients. The website's content and structure reflect a professional and user-friendly approach, with clear navigation and relevant business information. The business model focuses on providing accessible car rental services with customer support and FAQ resources to enhance user experience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS services. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with SEO best practices implemented through meta tags and structured data. The presence of Cookiebot for cookie consent and Google Analytics for traffic analysis indicates a mature digital infrastructure with attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms with granular user controls. However, some standard security headers are missing, and there is no explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, suggesting a reasonable security posture but with room for improvement in header implementation and formal security documentation. Overall, Toprent.lv presents a credible and professional online presence with solid business credibility and compliance with GDPR requirements. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a formal security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen trust and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching toprent.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Toprent.lv holds a stable market position as a medium-sized car rental provider in the Baltic region, leveraging an online booking platform to serve individuals and businesses. The company benefits from multilingual capabilities, targeting English, Latvian, Lithuanian, and Estonian speakers, which broadens its customer base. Revenue streams likely derive from vehicle rentals and associated services. The partnership ecosystem includes major advertising and analytics platforms such as Google and Meta, supporting marketing and retargeting efforts. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with updated content and cookie compliance, reflecting ongoing operational activity. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital marketing and enhance security transparency to improve competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, providing users control over tracking categories. The absence of critical vulnerabilities and exposed sensitive data is positive. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential areas for hardening. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which may hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie consent and privacy policy presence. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a stronger security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
toprent.lv
Description
Car rental service offering vehicle rentals primarily in the Baltic region with multilingual support.
Key services
Car rental, Customer support, Multilingual website
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent implemented with detailed categories
  3. Multiple language support for Baltic region
  4. No visible security policy or incident response info
  5. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  6. Contact info includes phone and email with clear context
  7. Uses common third-party analytics and marketing tools
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs Slick Carousel for UI elements and Selectize for enhanced select inputs. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, improving availability and DNS security. Performance is moderate with preloaded fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is well addressed with Rank Math plugin usage and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but present, with room for improvement. The technical stack is modern and maintainable, though some security best practices like additional HTTP headers are missing. Overall, the infrastructure supports business needs effectively with opportunities for optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with toprent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review toprent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.