Skip to main content

Security report for tonirovka.lv

Darts Serviss - Четверть века хорошего тона! · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Darts Serviss is a small Latvian company specializing in automotive window tinting services, operating since 1992. The website presents a professional image with clear business information, including contact details and physical address. The business targets vehicle owners seeking quality tinting and restyling services, positioning itself as an experienced and reliable provider in the local market. The website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as Revolution Slider and Contact Form 7, with integrations for Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, but lack explicit security headers and privacy policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is functional, moderately optimized, and trustworthy for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tonirovka.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on automotive window tinting and restyling. Its long operational history since 1992 suggests market experience and local reputation. The business model is service-based, targeting individual car owners and possibly small fleets. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some social media engagement. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer contact but lack comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which may affect compliance and user trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a clear market position as a specialized tinting service provider in Latvia.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap, especially under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. Incident response and security policy information are not present, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, formal policies, and regular vulnerability assessments.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and security policy to demonstrate security governance.
  5. Improve accessibility features and conduct audits to enhance usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Darts Serviss - Четверть века хорошего тона!
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Darts Serviss - Четверть века хорошего тона!
Description
Тонировка стёкол снизит напряжение глаз, вызванное ярким светом солнца, снегом, фарами, способ предотвратить выгорание салона, растрескивание приборной панели
Key services
Тонировка автомобильных стекол, Рестайлинг авто
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Revolution Slider, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, Contact Form 7, WP Smush
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some English metadata.
  3. Business is a small, local automotive window tinting service in Latvia.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Uses common WordPress plugins and technologies.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML content.
  8. Uses Google Analytics, Tag Manager, Hotjar for analytics and tracking.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Revolution Slider, and Contact Form 7. It uses Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, the site lacks explicit accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and lazy loading for images, improving load times. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tonirovka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tonirovka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.