Skip to main content

Security report for to-do.at

Tulzer & Osterauer · Real Estate · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tulzer & Osterauer is a specialized interior architecture firm focusing on planning and executing renovation and new construction projects for banks, offices, commercial premises, and hotels primarily in Austria. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring good design quality and mobile optimization. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and SEO optimization tools such as Rank Math PRO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though explicit privacy and terms of service policies are missing. No direct contact information is embedded in the HTML, which may affect user trust and compliance. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy compliance and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching to-do.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention to-do.at, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for to-do.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market segment providing interior architecture services tailored to banking and commercial clients. Its business model revolves around project planning and execution for renovation and new builds. The website targets professional clients in Austria, emphasizing expertise and specialization. The use of WordPress and Elementor indicates a cost-effective digital strategy with moderate technical maturity. The absence of visible contact details and formal policies suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with potential growth opportunities in digital trust and compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. Enhancing privacy documentation and incident response readiness would strengthen the security posture further.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  3. Include clear contact information, especially for security incidents and general inquiries.
  4. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure full GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tulzer & Osterauer
Description
Technische Innenarchitektur Büro, Planung & Abwicklung von Um- und Neubauprojekten. Spezialisten für Banken, Büros, Geschäftslokale, Hotels.
Key services
Interior architecture, Planning and execution of renovation and new construction projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math PRO SEO plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on interior architecture for banking and commercial clients
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Rank Math PRO SEO plugin
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web fonts and Font Awesome icons. SEO is enhanced via Rank Math PRO plugin. The site loads moderate resources including preloaded fonts and images, indicating decent performance. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were identified. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of HTTPS and security headers suggests a professionally managed environment. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and privacy-related technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with to-do.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review to-do.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.