Skip to main content

Security report for tmfg.fi

Fintraffic · Transportation · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fintraffic is a Finnish public service organization specializing in traffic management and safety across all transportation modes. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a modern Drupal 10 CMS infrastructure, integrated with advanced cookie consent management and analytics tools such as Matomo and Piwik Pro. The site demonstrates strong compliance with GDPR and privacy regulations, providing detailed cookie policies and user consent mechanisms. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers, though explicit security and incident response policies are not publicly detailed. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tmfg.fi

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tmfg.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tmfg.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fintraffic holds a key position in Finland's transportation sector, offering essential services in traffic control and management. The business model is focused on public service delivery with a broad target audience including citizens and governmental stakeholders. The website ecosystem includes multiple related subdomains and partner sites, indicating a well-integrated service network. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on digital self-service and partner collaboration. The company leverages analytics and marketing tools responsibly, maintaining transparency and user privacy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of reputable analytics and consent management platforms further enhances privacy compliance. However, the lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files, which could be areas for improvement. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency.
  2. Add clear contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance visibility of company contact information to improve user trust and support.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fintraffic
Description
Fintraffic tarjoaa ja kehittää liikenteenohjauksen ja -hallinnan palveluita kaikissa liikennemuodoissa sekä varmistaa liikenteen turvallisuuden ja sujuvuuden vastuullisesti kaikissa liikennemuodoissa.
Key services
Liikenteenohjaus, Liikenteenhallinta, Liikenteen turvallisuus, Liikennetilannepalvelut
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Matomo Analytics, CookieInformation Consent Management
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Piwik Pro, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Piwik Pro, New Relic
Marketing tools
Google Youtube cookies, Microsoft Bing cookies
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern cookie consent management.
  2. Comprehensive cookie policy with detailed cookie categories and third-party services.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page content provided.
  4. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with GDPR.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  6. Multiple external domains related to Fintraffic services and partners.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. Good use of security headers and HTTPS.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, supported by Matomo analytics and CookieInformation consent management. Hosting appears to leverage Amazon Web Services, inferred from cookie domains. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with no critical technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. Opportunities exist to enhance technical documentation and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tmfg.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tmfg.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.