Skip to main content

Security report for tjs.at

Tyrolean Jets & Services · Transportation · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

28/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tyrolean Jets & Services is a well-established private jet charter and aircraft management company based in Austria, with over 45 years of experience. The company offers premium private aviation services including luxury travel, aircraft management, and operations, targeting affluent individuals and businesses seeking exclusive and flexible travel options. Their website reflects a high level of professionalism with rich multimedia content and clear contact information, including physical addresses and social media presence. However, the technical infrastructure shows critical security weaknesses, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the security posture and user trust. The site implements cookie consent mechanisms but lacks a visible privacy policy and terms of service, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. Overall, while the business credibility and content quality are strong, urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tjs.at

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, specifically private aviation, with a business model focused on private jet charters and aircraft management. Their market position is solid, leveraging decades of experience and a reputation for sophisticated service. The inclusion of crypto payment options suggests innovation and adaptation to modern payment trends. The target audience includes high-net-worth individuals and corporate clients valuing exclusivity, flexibility, and premium service. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting the company's market positioning. Social media integration and multimedia presentations enhance customer engagement and brand visibility. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, indicating an independent operation. The lack of explicit certifications or security policies may be a competitive disadvantage in regulated markets.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, exposing users to potential data interception risks. Although several security headers are present, their effectiveness is limited without secure transport. No modern TLS protocols or cipher suites are enabled, and advanced security features like OCSP stapling and session resumption are missing. The site does not implement DNSSEC or CAA records, reducing domain security. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive aspect, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of privacy and security policies to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites to secure communications.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and prevent certificate mis-issuance.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and ensure all forms and inputs are secured against common web vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance accessibility features and performance optimizations to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tyrolean Jets & Services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, lazy loading for images, and Swiper.js for carousels. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn tracking for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and the lack of HTTPS is a critical technical flaw. The site uses JSON-LD structured data and Open Graph tags for SEO and social media integration. No hosting provider information is detected. The technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades to ensure safe and trustworthy user interactions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tjs.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tjs.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.