Skip to main content

Security report for titan-airways.com

Titan Airways · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Titan Airways operates as a UK-based charter airline offering bespoke air charter services primarily targeting corporate and private clients. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and a focus on transportation services. The business model centers on providing aircraft charter, cargo, and VIP flights, positioning itself as a reliable choice in the charter airline market. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks comprehensive security headers and explicit privacy and incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data and future-dated WHOIS update raise concerns about domain registration transparency, impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching titan-airways.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
39
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Titan Airways targets a niche market in the transportation sector, focusing on charter airline services. The company leverages a WordPress-based website optimized for SEO and user experience, supported by analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The business appears medium-sized with a founding date around 2019, but domain registration inconsistencies may affect credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its specialized charter services and professional online presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. The WHOIS data absence and future update timestamp may indicate privacy protection or registration issues, which could be a red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish a security incident response policy with clear contact channels.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
Company Number 02212225
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Titan Airways
Description
Titan Airways - the airline of choice
Key services
Aircraft charter, Cargo services, VIP and corporate flights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Font Awesome 7 Pro, Slick Carousel, Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo Player API
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues
  3. Professional airline website with clear branding and services
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but privacy policy and terms of service pages are not found
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts
  6. No explicit contact information or security incident response details found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, jQuery, Font Awesome 7 Pro, and Slick Carousel. It integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a focus on user behavior analysis and marketing optimization. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and technical optimization. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to enhance security and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with titan-airways.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review titan-airways.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.