Skip to main content

Security report for tiptop-group.de

tiptop GROUP · Real Estate · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

tiptop GROUP is a German-based company specializing in comprehensive building and industrial cleaning services, including facility maintenance and security services. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and multiple subsidiary brands, positioning itself as a regional expert in the real estate services sector. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging WordPress with Elementor, Google Tag Manager, and performance optimization plugins, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, but lacks published privacy policies and incident response contacts, which are critical for compliance and trust. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tiptop-group.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates multiple brands under the tiptop GROUP umbrella, targeting businesses and organizations requiring cleaning and facility services. Its business model focuses on service provision in real estate maintenance, industrial cleaning, and security. The website's structured data and SEO optimizations suggest a focus on digital marketing and customer acquisition. Absence of detailed registrant WHOIS data slightly reduces transparency but hosting aligns with the German market focus. The company appears medium-sized with a regional footprint and diversified service offerings, which may provide competitive advantages in local markets.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and security plugins like CleanTalk for spam protection and Borlabs Cookie for cookie consent, reflecting awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. No advanced security headers were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. These gaps could expose the company to regulatory risks and reduce user trust. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to publish comprehensive policies and enhance security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user and business obligations.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
tiptop GROUP
Description
Ihr Experte für Gebäudereinigung, Industriereinigung, Haus & Hof Dienste, Höhenreinigung und weitere Gebäudedienstleistungen.
Key services
Gebäudereinigung, Industriereinigung, Haus & Hof Dienste, Höhenreinigung, Küchenservice, Objektschutz
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Borlabs Cookie, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Cookie consent mechanism (Borlabs Cookie)
  • Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads (AW-11099566180)
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional business site for a German cleaning and facility services group.
  2. Content is in German and well-structured with clear service offerings.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. Uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Good SEO and structured data usage.
  10. Multiple brands and subsidiaries presented under the tiptop GROUP umbrella.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, using modern plugins for SEO (Yoast), analytics (Google Analytics via MonsterInsights), and performance (WP Rocket). It uses Google Tag Manager for marketing and tracking, and CleanTalk for anti-spam. Hosting is via rzone.de, a German hosting provider, consistent with the target market. The site is mobile-optimized and loads efficiently. However, accessibility features are basic, and some security headers are missing. The technical stack is solid but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tiptop-group.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tiptop-group.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.