Skip to main content

Security report for tintri.com

Tintri · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tintri is a technology company specializing in data management solutions tailored for virtualized workloads. Their offerings focus on providing enterprises with enhanced control, automation capabilities, and improved security for managing virtual data environments. The company has an established market presence since 2008, positioning itself as a specialized provider in the virtual data management sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting IT professionals and enterprises requiring advanced data management solutions. From a technical perspective, the website is built on WordPress using modern tools such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although performance is moderate. Security-wise, HTTPS is used, and a cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but there is room for improvement in security headers, DNSSEC, and published security policies. The security posture is adequate but lacks transparency in privacy and incident response policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and providing clear incident response contacts to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tintri.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tintri.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
159
Employees
9
Customers
125
Third parties
25
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-08 · 14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tintri.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –support.tintri.com2026-06-08
  • –jira.tintri.com2026-02-20
  • –support.tintri.com2026-02-20
  • –bugzilla.tintri.com2026-02-20
  • –identity.tintri.com2026-02-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tintri operates in the technology sector, focusing on data management for virtualized environments. Their business model revolves around providing software and solutions that automate and secure data processes for enterprises. The company targets IT departments and organizations with complex virtual infrastructure needs. Market positioning is that of a niche specialist with a medium-sized footprint, supported by a domain age of over 15 years, indicating stability. The presence of social media channels and professional branding suggests active engagement and marketing efforts. No direct information on revenue streams or partnerships was found, but the use of advanced web technologies and SEO tools indicates a focus on digital marketing and lead generation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were identified in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header configurations, enable DNSSEC, and publish security-related policies to improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  5. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tintri
Description
Discover the future of data management with Tintri. Gain more control, automate your processes, and enhance security.
Key services
Data management solutions, Automation of data processes, Security enhancement for virtual workloads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via WebToffee GDPR plugin.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with GoDaddy, created in 2008, expires in 2026.
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a potential security improvement area.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. Bootstrap is used for responsive design, contributing to good mobile optimization. The site loads external resources such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with standard HTML5 and CSS usage. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can be improved in security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tintri.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tintri.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.